On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:17 am, peter reilly wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:32, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> > Hi Jose,
> > you are right, it is not a good example to be using deprecated methods.
> > However, this is not a boiling problem.
> > I would rather fix this in 1.7 (but that is just
That is fine. One of the things that made me jump into it
is that if you look at the deprecated messages they say to use instead
blah, but it is difficult to figure out what it is meant by blah.
We should indicate better which and how to use the replacement methods,
it is really not clear and that
