Re: Contributions (was: Re: Suggestion - JUnit4 tests for Ant)

2013-03-08 Thread Michael Clarke
I'm not sure why my patch didn't make it onto the list so I've cloned the Ant Github repository to my account [1] and applied my example changes [2]. I'll leave the discussion around Git versus Subversion for others to debate (Git would get my vote for what it's worth). I'm happy to either contrib

Contributions (was: Re: Suggestion - JUnit4 tests for Ant)

2013-03-08 Thread Jesse Glick
First, BuildFileRule sounds like a great idea; do not see a patch so cannot comment further. Second, should Michael just be nominated as a committer? The @Ignore change was complex and valuable, and refactoring unit tests demonstrates serious intent. Third, why are we still using Subversion wh

RE: Suggestion - JUnit4 tests for Ant

2013-03-07 Thread Martin Gainty
Michael I dont see how upgrading Junit would have a 'direct impact' on any of the current releases of Ant(except for Ivy ) however There are many shoppes which run Junit under a Automated Test-framework such as selenium Generally there are release notes bundled which each version of Ant ..it wou

Re: Suggestion - JUnit4 tests for Ant

2013-03-07 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hi Michael, this sounds like a great idea. I do not know whether Ant is mirrored in GitHub, so far the process has been to create bug reports in bugzilla with the patches attached. I know that this is not always working in terms of having the patches be actually checked in but this is the only