Re: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-06 Thread peter reilly
On Monday 05 May 2003 20:20, J.Pietschmann wrote: > peter reilly wrote: > > I would agree with most of what Nicola says. I think > > that XML ns is a "heavy" solution for name clashing > > of names defined in a antlib. Moreover I do not > > think that the antlib needs to define a qualified name. >

Re: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-05 Thread J.Pietschmann
peter reilly wrote: I would agree with most of what Nicola says. I think that XML ns is a "heavy" solution for name clashing of names defined in a antlib. Moreover I do not think that the antlib needs to define a qualified name. The "prefix" attribute idea of the task could be used - even with the

Re: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-05 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
peter reilly wrote, On 04/05/2003 2.03: I would agree with most of what Nicola says. I think that XML ns is a "heavy" solution for name clashing of names defined in a antlib. Moreover I do not think that the antlib needs to define a qualified name. The "prefix" attribute idea of the task could be

RE: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-04 Thread Wannheden, Knut
> > Costin Manolache wrote, On 03/05/2003 8.22: > ... > > One use case I had in mind for CH was a namespace like "jmx:...", > > where the JMXComponentHelper would use the JMX metadata to > create the > > task ( no ant table ). That's clearly outside the scope of > antlib or ant ( > > it's just

Re: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-04 Thread peter reilly
I would agree with most of what Nicola says. I think that XML ns is a "heavy" solution for name clashing of names defined in a antlib. Moreover I do not think that the antlib needs to define a qualified name. The "prefix" attribute idea of the task could be used - even with the current command.

Re: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-03 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Costin Manolache wrote, On 03/05/2003 16.14: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: ... I think that XML namespaces really make things much more difficult to write and understand. One thing I don't like in Jelly is just this use of namespaces, where all scripts seem cluttered and simply difficult to read. I ag

Re: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: This seems interestig, and brings up what XML namespaces can be used for. XML namespaces are indented to disambiguate short local element and attribute names. Any sematic associated to XML namespaces beside this has to be weighted carefully. Lets take an example. There are

Re: Namespaces in Ant

2003-05-03 Thread Costin Manolache
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Costin Manolache wrote, On 03/05/2003 8.22: > ... >> One use case I had in mind for CH was a namespace like "jmx:...", >> where the JMXComponentHelper would use the JMX metadata to create the >> task ( no ant table ). That's clearly outside the scope of antlib or ant