On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday I said that macrodef attributes should be implemented as
> properties and not as textual substitution.
>
> On overnight reflection, I have changed by mind.
Cool, that makes two of us 8-)
> The proposed new notation is @{x}
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 13:50, Steve Cohen wrote:
> Peter -
> >>but if macrodef properties are to be implemented as textual substitution
> >>and not as local properties, the two issues can be separated.
>
> Did you mean to say "but if macrodef ATTRIBUTES are to be implemented as
> textual substitu
Peter -
>>but if macrodef properties are to be implemented as textual substitution
>>and not as local properties, the two issues can be separated.
Did you mean to say "but if macrodef ATTRIBUTES are to be implemented as
textual substitution and not as local properties ..."
Or are you talking ab
