Re: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-17 Thread Brian Topping
Dear Stefan, Yes, now I am starting to understand what's going on here. Ant must use a SAX parser, and it's well beyond the ability of the application to reconsider how the events are interpreted, including grouping them as a larger bundle of straight text. I've copied the XMLFragment code wit

Re: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> It is a problem, but one that would be rather hard to fix without >> breaking BWC. > > With a DynamicConfigurator-based impl of XMLFragment, yes. > > But that's not the only wa

RE: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-14 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There's one last twist about text handling in Ant that I > > discovered with a modified version of though: Ant > > merges text nodes for an element, calling addText() onl

Re: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's one last twist about text handling in Ant that I > discovered with a modified version of though: Ant > merges text nodes for an element, calling addText() only > once, so bde does not call addText("b") and > later addTex

RE: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-14 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ... arbitrary XML goes here ... > > > > and then serialize the DocumentFragment held by > XMLFragement into a String. Thanks for the explanation Stefan. I didn't grasp the fact that a DynamicConfigurator was still introspected

Re: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Brian Topping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to use DynamicConfigurator and need a bit of > clarification. I'd like to make the child text of a Task (defined > with a taskdef) be usable as a String by the Task. That would be the addText(String) method, no DynamicFoo

RE: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-13 Thread Dominique Devienne
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > But if the nested "text" is actually XML, isn't that > exactly what DynamicElement(NS) handles? I would think not. Text nodes are not elements in XML. Both TEXT and ELEMENT derive from Node directly. I don't think you

RE: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-13 Thread Matt Benson
But if the nested "text" is actually XML, isn't that exactly what DynamicElement(NS) handles? -Matt --- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Brian Topping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I'm trying to use DynamicConfigurator and need a > bit of clarification. > > I'd like t

RE: DynamicConfigurator and friends

2005-01-13 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Brian Topping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'm trying to use DynamicConfigurator and need a bit of clarification. > I'd like to make the child text of a Task (defined with a taskdef) be > usable as a String by the Task. > > The issue is that the "arbitrary" text is XML and I want to get