Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
2009/5/20 Dominique Devienne :
Yes, that's what I generate. Except I run through the properties file
and the build file to ensure I get all the (used) properties!
As apposed to what I remembered to put in (and didn't
2009/5/21 Dominique Devienne :
>> An example please Dominique?
>
> XML elements reading properties without the ${name} notation
>
>
>
> ...
>
> XML elements writing properties affecting the rest of the build:
>
>
>
I've not seen any of those.
Perhaps you could provide me with an example bui
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> 2009/5/20 Dominique Devienne :
>
>> I suggested postprocessing Ant's output as there are can hidden use of
>> properties which is not easy to pick up by parsing the Ant XML file
>> (they don't look like ${name} in attributes for example), and
2009/5/20 Dominique Devienne :
> I suggested postprocessing Ant's output as there are can hidden use of
> properties which is not easy to pick up by parsing the Ant XML file
> (they don't look like ${name} in attributes for example), and could
> thus possibly pick up info on more properties.
An
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> 2009/5/20 Dominique Devienne :
>
>> Maybe running in verbose or debug mode and grepping for all property
>> related messages, especially those about not finding the property, and
>> convert that into a build similarly to what you did? --DD
>
>
2009/5/20 Dominique Devienne :
> Maybe running in verbose or debug mode and grepping for all property
> related messages, especially those about not finding the property, and
> convert that into a build similarly to what you did? --DD
Yes
Possibly.
I chose Python and xslt.
I gather you don't fin
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> 2009/5/20 Dominique Devienne :
> Yes, that's what I generate. Except I run through the properties file
> and the build file to ensure I get all the (used) properties!
> As apposed to what I remembered to put in (and didn't change).
> That's th
2009/5/20 Dominique Devienne :
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> I keep changing them which results in undefined variables which ant
>> ignores, spreading odd filenames all over the place.
>
> What I used to do was use with a nested condition asserting for
> some properties
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> I keep changing them which results in undefined variables which ant
> ignores, spreading odd filenames all over the place.
What I used to do was use with a nested condition asserting for
some properties to be defined were indeed defined. Abor
> -Original Message-
> From: Kev Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 August 2006 9:59 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: Ant 1.7 - ReleaseInstructions - Compiler
>
>
> On 21 Aug 2006, at 21:19, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>
>
On 21 Aug 2006, at 21:19, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello Kev,
when you built the alpha version of ant 1.7, which compiler did you
use ? 1.4 or 1.5 ?
I used the default compiler, which at the moment is 1.5
Kev
--
"I call it the State where everyone, good or bad, is a poison-
drinker:
You have something that works but will not scale. You know that,
don't you?
Absolutely - but then I'm being paid to implement a spec, not to
suggest an alternative solution. This is the way it works in the
outsourcing/offshoring dev world - we just get a spec and have to
implement it reg
Kev Jackson wrote:
yes, cfengine and lcfg can keep your stuff in control. There's also
games you can play with vmware/xen hosted images, where the real CPUs
just host the virtual machines, and those you replicate off managed
"gold" images.
It's funny that you mention this, as my current pro
Steve Loughran wrote:
> That sounds like quite a rigorous process.
>
> yes, cfengine and lcfg can keep your stuff in control. There's also
> games you can play with vmware/xen hosted images, where the real CPUs
just host the virtual machines, and those you replicate off managed
"gold" images.
Steve Loughran wrote:
jfuller wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
jfuller wrote:
Looks good during my first checks.
looks good on OSX 10.4.6, will be testing this release on a
'serious' build server farm over the weekend (rhe4).
how many servers constitutes serious?
the system cons
yes, cfengine and lcfg can keep your stuff in control. There's also
games you can play with vmware/xen hosted images, where the real
CPUs just host the virtual machines, and those you replicate off
managed "gold" images.
It's funny that you mention this, as my current project is working o
jfuller wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
jfuller wrote:
Looks good during my first checks.
looks good on OSX 10.4.6, will be testing this release on a 'serious'
build server farm over the weekend (rhe4).
how many servers constitutes serious?
the system consists of 6 servers, in pairs
Steve Loughran wrote:
jfuller wrote:
Looks good during my first checks.
looks good on OSX 10.4.6, will be testing this release on a 'serious'
build server farm over the weekend (rhe4).
how many servers constitutes serious?
the system consists of 6 servers, in pairs of 2 (dev/critic
jfuller wrote:
Looks good during my first checks.
looks good on OSX 10.4.6, will be testing this release on a 'serious'
build server farm over the weekend (rhe4).
how many servers constitutes serious?
-
To unsubscribe
Looks good during my first checks.
looks good on OSX 10.4.6, will be testing this release on a 'serious'
build server farm over the weekend (rhe4).
-- Jim Fuller
---
FlameDigital Limited | Webcomposite s.r.o.
Technical Director
Co-Author WROX Pro PHP4 XML, WROX Pro PHP Web Service
I'm not sure I like the version number. No problem with the Saigon
bit, but should be 1.7.0alpha.
Looks good during my first checks.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kev:
> I notice that get-m2.xml is missing from the root of
> the jar;
er... tar I mean. :)
> fetch.xml now depends on it. Where did it
> go? :)
>
> -Matt
>
> --- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Fixed the download probl
Kev:
I notice that get-m2.xml is missing from the root of
the jar; fetch.xml now depends on it. Where did it
go? :)
-Matt
--- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fixed the download problem with some .htaccess mojo,
> so for your
> approval and delight:
>
> http://people.apache
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Jesse Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Java 5 adds a completely new sort of problems with APIs retrofitted
>> to support generics. Since Comparable is now Comparable the
>> BigInteger class used to have a method int compareTo(Object) and
>> now has
Kev Jackson wrote:
I can build all the ant-* jars except ant-starteam and ant-weblogic
I've contacted borland regarding getting access to starteam sdk
without having to sign up to some ridiculous trial/download nonsense.
[...]
Note that we could set up separate source roots containing phony cl
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Say there is a method
void doSomething(Object o);
in a class inside the Java class library of JDK 1.3 and a new overload
void doSomething(String s);
was added in JDK 1.4. Any call to doSomething("") compiled on JDK 1.4
and above will pick the String signature
On 5 Jun 2006, at 03:08, Steve Loughran wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I am having a look at http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning
We are still on the step "finding a release manager"
Do we have any candidates ?
I'm tempted to do it but can't as I am three chapters out from
fin
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I am having a look at http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning
We are still on the step "finding a release manager"
Do we have any candidates ?
I'm tempted to do it but can't as I am three chapters out from finishing
the text of the book, then its all the o
,
Antoine
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:22:43 -0500
> Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7 release
>
> >We simply can't. Leaving the generics/erasure problem aside, the
We simply can't. Leaving the generics/erasure problem aside, there is
a way to ensure you don't compile against methods that are too new,
but it is painful: start building with JDK 1.2, compile what hasn't
been compiled by building with JDK 1.3, repeat with JDK 1.4 and 1.5.
What about "cross-co
Hi,
I am going to make these jars available to Kevin.
Regards,
Antoine
Kev Jackson wrote:
> A quick update regarding my situation trying to build a test release
> dist.
>
> I can now bootstrap everything except starteam and weblogic. I'm also
> having a strange issue with Echo not compiling in
A quick update regarding my situation trying to build a test release
dist.
I can now bootstrap everything except starteam and weblogic. I'm
also having a strange issue with Echo not compiling in eclipse (but
works fine from command line).
ie, I can build all the ant-* jars except ant-sta
Kev Jackson wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2006, at 10:02, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am having a look at http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning
>>
>> We are still on the step "finding a release manager"
>>
>> Do we have any candidates ?
>>
>
> I'd be happy to help, but before I offer
On 2 Jun 2006, at 11:37, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2 Jun 2006, at 11:16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Object signature alternative. It is impossible to compile code on
JDK 1.5 that uses the method and still works on JDK 1.4 - but the
opp
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2 Jun 2006, at 11:16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> Object signature alternative. It is impossible to compile code on
>> JDK 1.5 that uses the method and still works on JDK 1.4 - but the
>> opposite is also true
>
> This leaves us i
On 2 Jun 2006, at 11:16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Object signature alternative. It is impossible to compile code
on JDK 1.5 that uses the method and still works on JDK 1.4 - but the
opposite is also true
This leaves us in a pickle unless we can guarantee that the every
line of code will both
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Not sure if we can build Ant 1.7 under JDK 1.5 also all in one
>>go and still produce jars which can run under 1.2.
>
> Should be possible (but I would do a test after the build...)
>
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/wind
Hi all,
I'm not confirming yet to be release manager, but I'm preparing a
build environment with all libs etc - so I'm edging my hat into the ring
you need the libs for all the optional tasks described in the section
"installing ant" of the manual.
I have all the latest libs as describe
Kev Jackson wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2006, at 10:02, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am having a look at http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning
>>
>> We are still on the step "finding a release manager"
>>
>> Do we have any candidates ?
>>
>
> I'd be happy to help, but before I offer mys
On 1 Jun 2006, at 10:02, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I am having a look at http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning
We are still on the step "finding a release manager"
Do we have any candidates ?
I'd be happy to help, but before I offer myself as the 'release
manager', what would
Its on my todo list to do full deployment from smartfrog to the
various app servers, even though we tend to use jetty in-process for
our day to day work. Lightweight, easily configured, self-contained.
I'll have to try jetty, it's been on my list of web containers to try
for donkey's years.
Kev Jackson wrote:
I'm trying to set up a conf call with the junit team, to see how best
to go with the junit4 support. I am currently thinking
- stays 3.8.x only.
-we add a new junit antlib for junit4 support, design it to work on
1.6.5 and 1.7
-maybe hand off ownership of the antlib to the
I'm trying to set up a conf call with the junit team, to see how best
to go with the junit4 support. I am currently thinking
- stays 3.8.x only.
-we add a new junit antlib for junit4 support, design it to work on
1.6.5 and 1.7
-maybe hand off ownership of the antlib to the junit team, if they
( I just replied using the wrong from: address, so it probably wont go
through. lets try again)
Kev Jackson wrote:
to allow adding of jars to the current classloader
(would solve a /lot/ of problems at the cost of some
issues)[peter] (status RE "some issues" risk? -MJB)
Prima
Kev Jackson wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Kev Jackson wrote:
Hi,
Checked the planning wiki this morning and noticed that the release
schedule for the first beta of 1.7 is set at May/June this year.
Since this is rapidly approaching, what are the thoughts on
a: timing,
each releas
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Kev Jackson wrote:
Hi,
Checked the planning wiki this morning and noticed that the release
schedule for the first beta of 1.7 is set at May/June this year.
Since this is rapidly approaching, what are the thoughts on
a: timing,
each release requires a vote.
Kev Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Checked the planning wiki this morning and noticed that the release
> schedule for the first beta of 1.7 is set at May/June this year.
>
> Since this is rapidly approaching, what are the thoughts on
> a: timing,
each release requires a vote. A vote is open one week. but
Matt,
Just verified your changes have fixed the problem relating to Cargo and
the NullPointer I was experiencing - thanks for looking into it for me.
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
On 4/18/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I checked out appfuse, DL'd Tomcat... then it
> wants mysql, which I just don't have time to install
> too right now. :) I will check in my changes anyway.
Thanks, I have all these installed as my 'day job' is
server-side/web-app java, s
Well, I checked out appfuse, DL'd Tomcat... then it
wants mysql, which I just don't have time to install
too right now. :) I will check in my changes anyway.
-Matt
--- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >well, obviously if I broke them it's entirely
> likely
> >they won't be alone. P
well, obviously if I broke them it's entirely likely
they won't be alone. Probably the easiest/most BC
thing will be some form of checking whether
(Abstract?)FileSet instances have a project set and
using the task's project if not (I think fileset
handling is separate from other ResourceCollect
--- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm,
>
> In the cargo code we have:
>
> /**
> * Remove all file in the configuration directory.
> */
> private void cleanConfigurationDirectory()
> {
> // Clean up stuff previously put in the
> temporary directory but do not
> // remove t
Hm,
In the cargo code we have:
/**
* Remove all file in the configuration directory.
*/
private void cleanConfigurationDirectory()
{
// Clean up stuff previously put in the temporary directory but do not
// remove the Cargo timestamp file
Delete delete = (Delete) getAntUtils().create
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello Kev,
the question is which piece of code creates the filesets which are added
here to the delete task.
this piece of code is probably creating the filesets in such a way that
the project field is not set.
I imagine this happens in the org.codehaus.cargo.contain
Hello Kev,
the question is which piece of code creates the filesets which are added
here to the delete task.
this piece of code is probably creating the filesets in such a way that
the project field is not set.
I imagine this happens in the org.codehaus.cargo.container codebase.
Changing in Delet
the condition on
the right antlib.
For the syntax of the language itself, any of the ones proposed is fine.
Jose Alberto
> -Original Message-
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 17:28
> To: 'Ant Developers List'
>
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually is too wordy. A mall is translated into
Complex conditions are big. A small expression language like "XXX &&
YYY" would be much nicer.
I so agree with you! That expression language could (should IMHO!) be XPat
"Jack J. Woehr" wrote:
> Hmm, this is something interesting for Ant in itself.
>
> truevalue="yes was 9" />
>
> Is there an expression evaluating jar that could be added to optional?
There's the Math task in Ant-Contrib which does part of this.
And
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
> But this would require defining a proper expression evaluation language
> for it.
Hmm, this is something interesting for Ant in itself.
Is there an expression evaluating jar that could be added to optional?
--
Jack J. Woehr # We have gone from the hor
ot something simple at all.
Jose Alberto
-Original Message-
From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 May 2004 17:10
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: ANT 1.7 features suggestion
Actually is too wordy. A mall is
translated into
Complex conditions are bi
simple at all.
Jose Alberto
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 17:10
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: ANT 1.7 features suggestion
>
>
> Actually is too wordy. A mal
> From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Actually is too wordy. A mall is translated into
>
> Complex conditions are big. A small expression language like "XXX &&
> YYY" would be much nicer.
I so agree with you! That expression language could (should IMHO!) be XPath
(JXpath o
Actually is too wordy. A mall is translated into
Complex conditions are big. A small expression language like "XXX &&
YYY" would be much nicer.
- Alexey.
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do use it also. Do you know whethe
> From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I do use it also. Do you know whether it will become a part
> of main ANT?
>
So why you feel unconfortable about using is the fact that is not
part of the supported CORE of ANT. Is that it?
That may give some food for thought, to the
Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: ANT 1.7 features suggestion
Frequently I need several properties to be checked to enable
or disable
a target. A boolean expression would be much better than a list of
properties, but I would be happy with just a list. I think if should
have && inside and u
Ok, what is wrong with using ?
Besides, look&feel.
Jose Alberto
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 15:33
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: ANT 1.7 features suggestion
>
>
> Frequently I n
Frequently I need several properties to be checked to enable or disable
a target. A boolean expression would be much better than a list of
properties, but I would be happy with just a list. I think if should
have && inside and unless should have ||.
- Alexey.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 04 Ma
On Tue, 04 May 2004, Alexey N. Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Could you please also update if and unless to accept a list of
> properties?
if="A, B" would mean "A is set and B is set" or "A is set or B is
set"?
You know that propertiy names are allowed to contain spaces and commas
and a
I'm soo late for the party that I'll try to not restart the whole
thing.
On Tue, 04 May 2004, Anthony Goubard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Integrate if and unless at the Task level.
A nested would be far more powerful, as would be an
task. Don't expect any opinion from me. 8-)
> 3) Reg
I'm soo late for the party that I'll try to not restart the whole
thing.
On Tue, 04 May 2004, Anthony Goubard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Integrate if and unless at the Task level.
A nested would be far more powerful, as would be an
task. Don't expect any opinion from me. 8-)
> 3) Reg
Dale Anson wrote:
AntContrib has a couple of tasks that handle this specific situation,
see and . is analogous to ,
is analogous to , both allow returning property
values set in the remote target. Also see AntContrib's or
Antelope's task (these are identical) which call a target in
the s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Integrate if and unless at the Task level.
This would allow all ANT tasks to have the if and unless
attribute (the
same way that it has an id attribute).
So far the only way to do it is by using except if
you use one
of the task which has already the "if" "unless" a
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > But we already have all this in our ANT conditions. So why
> do we want
> > to redefine them again with a new syntax? How do you add new
> > conditions? Because the need for ne
> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > -100 :-\
> > >
> > > IMHO, if/unless in targets are one of the worst features we have in
> > > the ANT language.
>
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > -100 :-\
> >
> > IMHO, if/unless in targets are one of the worst features we have in
> > the ANT language.
>
> I'm completely at the other end of the spectrum! I think
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6) Get the properties from a target after antcall
At the moment if you have a target that define some properties, the
only way to call it in order to get the values is using "depends".
This is a problem as you may want to invoke your target not
necessary
at the beginn
> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -100 :-\
>
> IMHO, if/unless in targets are one of the worst features we have in the
> ANT language.
I'm completely at the other end of the spectrum! I think if/unless, and
extension of these that I coded up in my custom tasks/types, m
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 May 2004 01:26
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: ANT 1.7 features suggestion
>
>
> Could you please also update if and unless to accept a list
> of properties?
>
> - Alexey.
>
> Sullivan, Sean C - MWT wrote:
>
>
After the task, what about this, that downloads 'plugins' and
s them?
http://antworks.sourceforge.net/
http://url-to/plugin/"; />
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgo
> 1) Integrate if and unless at the Task level.
> This would allow all ANT tasks to have the if and unless
> attribute (the
> same way that it has an id attribute).
> So far the only way to do it is by using except if
> you use one
> of the task which has already the "if" "unless" attributes
Could you please also update if and unless to accept a list of properties?
- Alexey.
Sullivan, Sean C - MWT wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Goubard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A few weeks ago, there was a discussion about the new features in ANT
1.7.
[...]
1) Integrate i
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Goubard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> A few weeks ago, there was a discussion about the new features in ANT
1.7.
>
> [...]
>
> 1) Integrate if and unless at the Task level.
> This would allow all ANT tasks to have the if and unless attribute
(the
Hi,
I understand your point as 2 months ago I was still running Windows 98
(first edition ;-)) and developing a swing program that could run with
Java 1.1.8
As I wrote in my answer to Steve, Ant would still work the same for jdk
1.2 users, it's just a way to reduce the number of jar files in the
Steve Loughran wrote:
Anthony Goubard wrote:
Hello,
A few weeks ago, there was a discussion about the new features in ANT
1.7.
I've made a list of features that I think would be useful in ANT and
that I'd like to discuss on this mailing list.
Maybe some of you would have a usage of these new fea
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Goubard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 12:01 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: ANT 1.7 features suggestion
Hello,
- I think that more than 50% of the users uses Java 1.4
I think that is unrealistic. In decent to large
Anthony Goubard wrote:
Hello,
A few weeks ago, there was a discussion about the new features in ANT 1.7.
I've made a list of features that I think would be useful in ANT and
that I'd like to discuss on this mailing list.
Maybe some of you would have a usage of these new feature for your
existing
> Maybe it is possible to revive this vfs project. Other people sending
> emails to the list have mentioned the slide project
> and also the new http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170 Java Content
> Repository API proposal.
> I have had a look at the JCR web page. I think that there is some
> overl
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My thinking here was if there existed two file
> collection abstractions, say
> o.a.t.a.types.AbstractFileSet and
> o.a.t.a.types.maybenewpackagehere.NewFileSetInterface,
> each could be d to adapt to the other, so
> that the maximum nu
Anthony Goubard wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
In any case I am starting to think about ant 1.7 and further.
Here are the points which spring to my mind :
1) local properties,
Here I'd like to point out to something strange I saw last month; properties
are local if you use antcall but not with depends :
Hi,
>Hi,
>
>
>In any case I am starting to think about ant 1.7 and further.
>
>Here are the points which spring to my mind :
>
>1) local properties,
Here I'd like to point out to something strange I saw last month; properties
are local if you use antcall but not with depends :
In any case I am starting to think about ant 1.7 and further.
Here are the points which spring to my mind :
1) local properties,
2) roles,
3) get the xdocs proposal out,
4) think about virtual file system abstractions, and do something
about them,
5) fix some popular bugs from bugzilla
How about
> And we must take our time to design more general APIs. The best thing
> would be to do it in a sandbox with a big shield on the
> sandbox "Warning
> - works here - no backward compatibility guaranteed" so that the guys
> developing there can experiment freely different designs.
Maybe I´ve fo
Matt,
pay attention that most of our tasks - even if you add some
introspection magic - could not work with something different from the
current filesets.
a lot of tasks, say , , ... are very file
orientated.
It is not enough to have vfs-filesets or something like that, you need
to have the
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > is it currently possible to use a type as its own
> class if
> > available, then adapt if possible instead?
>
> I'm not sure I follow you here. My guess is that
> the answer is no,
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
...
The xdocs stuff require time to get the method for processing the xml to
html right, and even more to migrate the existing content to new formats.
Once it will be finished, it should improve a little bit the homogeneity
of the doc, make it more easy to maintain (ho
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My personal pet features that are quite high on my TODO list:
>
> * DynamicConfiguratorNS
>
> * task input/output features - I really need to write down the
> proposal. Basically[1].
>
> * unification of our File collection types in some way
Peter Reilly wrote:
3) get the xdocs proposal out,
4) think about virtual file system abstractions, and do something
about them,
This sounds like fun.., but may be difficult to achieve in the same
timeframe as local
properties and roles.
you are right the time frame for these points could exten
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I do not know if we will make some further releases of ant 1.6. My
guess is that there might be from time to time the need for a release
due to "environmental factors", such as the release of a new version
of an operating system forcing us to adapt the famous Os c
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or, an antlib could register its own tasks to override the default
tasks (is that possible today?).
You can replace tasks with your own, yes. I'm not sure whether you
can do so for any namespace, but at le
> I think forrest is good for static site generation; I am
> getting ready
> to move my work project (smartfrog.org) to it from msword.
> Because you
> can plug in other transforms, we could have xdoclet generate
> source XML
> from the docs, and then use forrest to turn it into the
> site/p
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
