RE: [PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc

2003-09-30 Thread Jan . Materne
> > So, most of opensource java software create javadoc document with > > javadoc task. This means I can't put such a package into main > > section beacuse javadoc depend on SUN's implentation which is not > > oss. > > Strictly speaking, you can build the package but you can't build the > docs. I

Re: [PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc

2003-09-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Debian have 'main' and 'contrib' section. 'main' group is official > debian package which mean it's compiled and run opensource > platform(e.g. kaffe/gcj) 'contrib' group is non-official which mean > it's opensource but can't be bui

Re: [PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc

2003-09-27 Thread Takashi Okamoto
Hi Stefan, From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc Date: 26 Sep 2003 11:40:12 +0200 > > In the past, I refactored rmic for other than SUN's rmic > > implementation. > > Yes, I remember that.

Re: [PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc

2003-09-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Sorry, I meant to respond to this a lot earlier. On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Current javadoc task support only SUN's javadoc. However there are > another javadoc engine like gjdoc which is GNU's javadoc altenative. How similar/different are javadoc and gjdoc