Thanks!
-Matt
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> directory scanning speed has improved a lot in
> certain
> >> configurations
> >
> > Stefan, could you point me to
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> directory scanning speed has improved a lot in certain
>> configurations
>
> Stefan, could you point me to something that will
> elaborate on that statement?
Apart from the cvs commits
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> directory
> scanning speed has improved a lot in certain
> configurations
...
Stefan, could you point me to something that will
elaborate on that statement? I hadn't noticed that in
any of the 1.6 notes I've read...
Thanks,
Matt
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of the smaller projects are usually (but not always) untouched,
> but they are touched just often enough that it is important for the
> master build to always build them.
Maybe (just maybe) Ant 1.6 will help here as well, as direc
: Ant Developers List
Cc:
Subject:Re: Question about MacroDef vs antcall
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:18 am, Steve Cohen wrote:
> The new ant features wiki
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewAntFeaturesInDetail/MacroDe
>f
>
> says:
>
> "
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:18 am, Steve Cohen wrote:
> The new ant features wiki
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewAntFeaturesInDetail/MacroDe
>f
>
> says:
>
> "If you are using as a macro substitute, you really should look
> into this task. It is not only going to simplify your buil
The new ant features wiki
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewAntFeaturesInDetail/MacroDef
says:
"If you are using as a macro substitute, you really should look into
this task. It is not only going to simplify your build files but also speed up
your builds considerably as you skip
