[GitHub] [ant] bodewig commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

bodewig commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-671948800 replaced with #135 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [ant] bodewig closed pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

bodewig closed pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the sp

[GitHub] [ant] babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-667827262 @bodewig Tested the #135 and things are working as expected. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se

[GitHub] [ant] bodewig commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

bodewig commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-667674899 @babasaikiran please take a look at #135 for my suggestion for fixing the bug This is an automated message from the Ap

[GitHub] [ant] bodewig commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

h new methods left and right and allow `PropertySet` to use that. I'll sketch this in a branch. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [ant] babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-666360443 Thanks @bodewig , ` ./bootstrap.sh ` is the missing piece and now i am able to reproduce it. This is an automate

[GitHub] [ant] bodewig commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

bodewig commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-666339391 It's been several years since I last looked at the implementation of local properties, something I need to change before I can merge your PR anyway. Right now I'm not sure of all the

[GitHub] [ant] babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-666075584 I am on Linux mint 20 and with **jdk1.8.0_181**. Executed the test case with commnad: `./build.sh antunit-tests -Dantunit.testcase=**/local-test.xml`. here is the outp

[GitHub] [ant] bodewig commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

bodewig commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-665651176 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th

[GitHub] [ant] babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-665677054 @bodewig , had a look at the fail case.. seems this particular testcase is failing only on windows environment. Will try to get a windows machine to try and fix it.

[GitHub] [ant] babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

babasaikiran commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-660437861 @jaikiran Any update on this ? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messag

[GitHub] [ant] jaikiran commented on pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

jaikiran commented on pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126#issuecomment-630551552 this is ok to test This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [ant] babasaikiran opened a new pull request #126: support to access local properties via propertyset

babasaikiran opened a new pull request #126: URL: https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/126 The fix here is to honor the local variables in propertyset within the local scope. Below is the bug related to the fix. [Bug 50179 - Properties declared as "local" are not acce

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37760] New: - Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37760 Summary: Helper method 'setMapper' on PropertySet does not work Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: All URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ant/core/trunk/src/mai n/org/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36151] - PropertySet::addPropertyNames causes NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36151] New: - PropertySet::addPropertyNames causes NullPointerException

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36151 Summary: PropertySet::addPropertyNames causes NullPointerException Product: Ant Version: 1.6.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priori

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35653] New: - PropertySet defined as a nested element in antcall does not work as entries

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35653 Summary: PropertySet defined as a nested element in antcall does not work as entries Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity:

RE: Environment and PropertySet

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > My reason for wanting to nest the propertyset into > a > > regular element is that these are passed by > > and to an Environment > > obj

RE: Environment and PropertySet

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My reason for wanting to nest the propertyset into a > regular element is that these are passed by > and to an Environment > object. This means that if the code is added to > Environment, so that: > > >

RE: Environment and PropertySet

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have > its > > > key & value

RE: Environment and PropertySet

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I knew there were a discussion about that ... > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=106278198725781&w=2 Eh, I even said the same thing back then! ;-) --DD -- This e-m

RE: Environment and PropertySet

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have its > > key & value attributes set as usual > > > > I wonder about the feeling o

AW: Environment and PropertySet

etreff: Re: Environment and PropertySet > > On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have its > > key & value attributes set as usual > > > > I wonder about the feeling of the dev communi

Re: Environment and PropertySet

On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have its > key & value attributes set as usual > > I wonder about the feeling of the dev community on such a > change... ? Works for me, although we better

Environment and PropertySet

There is a question on the userlist about setting environment variables en masse with (e.g.) . If we modified oata.types.Environment and $Variable such that-- Variable can accept a nested PropertySet OR have its key & value attributes set as usual Variables with nested PropertySets set mult

[Ant Wiki] New: WatchoutFor/PropertySet

Date: 2004-02-28T21:53:51 Editor: 218.214.49.176 <> Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: WatchoutFor/PropertySet URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/WatchoutFor/PropertySet no comment New Page: The propertyref nested element of the propertyset nested task supports regular expressions throu

Re: PropertySet

Thanks, got it. Duh. Properties are immutable. I wasn't thinking. On Thursday 26 February 2004 7:15 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How do you negate a non-boolean property? How do you negate null? > > I think Matt wants to negate the

Re: PropertySet

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you negate a non-boolean property? How do you negate null? I think Matt wants to negate the selection of properties that makes up the property set. A way to say "all properties except those that start with prefix foo". Stefan

Re: PropertySet

--- Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you negate a non-boolean property? How do > you negate null? > Answer: You don't. You negate the selection criteria, not the values... :) example: -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protectio

Re: PropertySet

On Thursday 26 February 2004 4:12 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have put together a patch for negating the selected > > properties of a PropertySet. > >

Re: PropertySet

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have put together a patch for negating the selected > properties of a PropertySet. Sounds useful. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

PropertySet

I have put together a patch for negating the selected properties of a PropertySet. I think this can be useful, but since it's an enhancement I thought I'd probe the waters for any emotions either for or against... -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail