Re: PropertyHelper breaks ant-contrib

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, thanks for the triage! > > --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The problem is that ComponentHelper checks if "task" >> classe are >> suitable for being ant classes: ... Thanks to both of you! Gump is happy with ant

Re: PropertyHelper breaks ant-contrib

Okay, thanks for the triage! --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that ComponentHelper checks if "task" > classe are > suitable for being ant classes: > > /** > * Checks whether or not a class is suitable for > serving as Ant task. > * Ant task implementatio

Re: PropertyHelper breaks ant-contrib

The problem is that ComponentHelper checks if "task" classe are suitable for being ant classes: /** * Checks whether or not a class is suitable for serving as Ant task. * Ant task implementation classes must be public, concrete, and have * a no-arg constructor. * * @pa

Re: PropertyHelper breaks ant-contrib

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > see > > > Apparently AntCallBack's test tries to install a > PropertyHelper (I'm > not familiar with either the task's no

PropertyHelper breaks ant-contrib

Hi, see Apparently AntCallBack's test tries to install a PropertyHelper (I'm not familiar with either the task's nor the test's code, just pointing out the error) and wants to use