Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Paul Mackay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way to avoid this high memory usage and time spent
building a list?
No. And you'll see that Ant 1.7 is both a bit better and a bit worse
than it used to be. Directoryscanner has probably become a
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Paul Mackay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to avoid this high memory usage and time spent
> building a list?
No. And you'll see that Ant 1.7 is both a bit better and a bit worse
than it used to be. Directoryscanner has probably become a bit faster
but at the
I don't profess to know the code as well as the committers, but I don't
see how this would be feasible.
First off, how would an iterative approach actually be faster?
DirectoryScanner (or its iterative equivalent) would still have to do the
same amount of work to select the files, so even thou
Hello,
I have been trialling Ant as a driver for a large scale build execution.
The preparation before the build involves copying and unzipping >100,000
files spread across >20,000 directories. When using Ant's built in copy
task with filesets selecting large parts of these files, a long time is
s
