Re: Ivy 2.5.2 incompatibility with JDK 21 due to Pack200 removal

Hi Jaikiran, On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 07:09:13AM +0530, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello Michel, > > I've approved your account creation. Please go ahead and create a JIRA > issue. I suspect, as a minimum you would require a fix like the one below: > Thanks, I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/

Re: Ivy 2.5.2 incompatibility with JDK 21 due to Pack200 removal

get to Apache Ivy that - JDK 11 has just been retired in Rawhide (which will become Fedora 42 next spring) - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-11-openjdk/c/eef5cae1618adf22b43adb9e243580e26aaab57c?branch=rawhide - The only JDK in Fedora 42 and RHEL 10 is JDK 21 - Ivy does not compile

Ivy 2.5.2 incompatibility with JDK 21 due to Pack200 removal

val of the deprecated Pack200, per https://openjdk.org/jeps/336 ``` [javac] /builddir/build/BUILD/apache-ivy-2.5.2-build/apache-ivy-2.5.2/src/java/org/apache/ivy/util/FileUtil.java:49: er ror: cannot f

Re: Pack200

Mark Claassen wrote: Well, I don't think it will be too difficult, and there certainly are a lot of core ant tasks I can pull information from. So, if I get bored sometime, maybe I will give it a whirl. I could still use it, even if no one else does. :) Thanks for the advice. Mark Go for it

RE: Pack200

From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:31 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Pack200 Mark Claassen wrote: > PININ' for the FJORDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?, look, why did > he fall flat on his back the moment I got 'im h

Re: Pack200

invisibile!! THIS IS AN EX-PROJECT!! I always appreciate a bit a levity. well,lets just say I wouldnt expect a christmas card from it. --- So, the Harmony project will follow the specifications of the pack200 format, but not necessarily the interface (options as so on)? Not that you have an

RE: Pack200

S AN EX-PROJECT!! I always appreciate a bit a levity. --- So, the Harmony project will follow the specifications of the pack200 format, but not necessarily the interface (options as so on)? Not that you have any control over it, but that seems like a poor decision. I hope it is similar enough so t

Re: Pack200

Mark Claassen wrote: Well, be that as it may, I feel that having a pack200 task would be a great feature. We distribute our code via webstart and the pack200 format really does do a great job compressing jar files. The code I got from java.net did not quite work for me and I had to modify it

Re: Pack200

On 12/18/06, Mark Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, be that as it may, I feel that having a pack200 task would be a great feature. We distribute our code via webstart and the pack200 format really does do a great job compressing jar files. The code I got from java.net did not

RE: Pack200

Well, be that as it may, I feel that having a pack200 task would be a great feature. We distribute our code via webstart and the pack200 format really does do a great job compressing jar files. The code I got from java.net did not quite work for me and I had to modify it quite a bit. I

Re: Pack200

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Mark Claassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I though with the java.net project that Pack200 would be included in > ANT 1.7. Is this planned for a future release? AFAIK the people developing the tasks at java.net have never approached us - and we certainly don&#

Pack200

I though with the java.net project that Pack200 would be included in ANT 1.7. Is this planned for a future release? I have an implementation that I modified from somewhere to work like a fileset. I have not spent too much time developing ANT tasks, and so it might need to be cleanup up a bit

AW: Pack200?

Because Pack200 is part of "standard" java and it should improve java apps (especially WebStart) I think we should have something like a ... But when JDK 1.5 came out (as beta I think) we had a discussion [1] already... Searching [2] the mailinglist I found a note to an external

Re: Pack200?

Hello, Greg Winton wrote: I found this link... https://java-pack200-ant-task.dev.java.net/ I didn't look any further, but perhaps this is what you are looking for? Greg To be honest, it seems pretty rudimentary. I'm working on my own version, with support for s, checking date

Re: Pack200?

I found this link... https://java-pack200-ant-task.dev.java.net/ I didn't look any further, but perhaps this is what you are looking for? Greg On 11/11/05, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lilianne E. Blaze wrote: > > Hello, > > I've notic

Re: Pack200?

Lilianne E. Blaze wrote: Hello, I've noticed there are no Pack200 tasks? Why? because there aren't Is anyone working on them at the moment? Or are they available externally? If they are, shouldn't they at least be mentioned in the manual? Because there is a limi

Pack200?

Hello, I've noticed there are no Pack200 tasks? Why? Is anyone working on them at the moment? Or are they available externally? If they are, shouldn't they at least be mentioned in the manual? Greetings, Liliann

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: What do people think? I will wait to see what are we interested on doing before aproaching Bill. I know him from my time at Maryland, hope he still remembers me. I'm very interested. If we do get an implementation for JDK1.2 - then it makes sense to have it in the cor

RE: Task for the new Pack200 format

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > With respect on providing a version of pack200 usable by > lesser JDKs I > > think than rather trying to reproduce the thing

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With respect on providing a version of pack200 usable by lesser JDKs > I think than rather trying to reproduce the thing from scratch, we > could just as well ask Bill Puig if he would be willing to > cont

RE: Breaking Ant into several modules (was RE: Task for the new Pack200 format)

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I agree with the goal to make as many things antlibs as possible, I > > could even be convinced that we start to break up our > current set of > > core/optional tasks into antlibs with independent release cycles. > > Then we´ll earn th

RE: Task for the new Pack200 format

> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 February 2004 14:59 > To: 'Ant Developers List' > Subject: RE: Task for the new Pack200 format > > > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If we stick with JDK 1.5 only, this w

RE: Task for the new Pack200 format

I'm not sure about the antlib approach. > > > > Why not support pack200/unpack200 directly from the and , > > whenever running on JDK 1.5? > > I rather thought about making create the packed files > without intermediat jars, so the task would be > without chang

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> If we stick with JDK 1.5 only, this would become a two very simple >> tasks, so I'm not sure about the antlib approach. > > Why not support

RE: Task for the new Pack200 format

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > If we stick with JDK 1.5 only, this would become a two very simple > tasks, so I'm not sure about the antlib approach. Why not support pack200/unpack200 directly from the and , whenever running on JDK 1.5? In /, it would add a

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On 11 Feb 2004, Denis N. Antonioli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The specification is in the jsr itself, you'll need to get the zip. > See the 'Download' link on: > This is what you get for setting "Accept images that come from t

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Alexey N. Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html > > I can't seem to find a link describing the pack algorithm (detailed > enough that I'd be able to reimplem

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

kes me believe that I shouldn't use his article as a base for any algorithm that is supposed to be compatible with Tiger's Pack200 implementation. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Antlib. If we really want to reimplement the algorithm so that it becomes usable for JDK < 1.5 I agree with this. It sounds like a candidate for a Pack200 library in Commons plus Ant tasks plus command line utilities

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Alexey N. Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html I can't seem to find a link describing the pack algorithm (detailed enough that I'd be able to reimplement it) that has finally been implemented for Tiger from

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

g/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >A JDK 1.5 only > implementation would be > >trivial. Based on the information in William Pugh's "Compressing Java Class Files" article, reinventing the wheel in this case sounds disti

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

It is there: http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr200/index.html - Alexey. Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "core tasks" would be the right solution if it could be implemented using JDK1.3 1.2, you mean 8-) So far I haven'

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "core tasks" would be the right solution if it could be implemented > using JDK1.3 1.2, you mean 8-) So far I haven't found a technical spec for the format so I don't know whether we can implement it. A JDK 1.5 only implementati

RE: Task for the new Pack200 format

> >>Do we want to make them core tasks or do we want to farm > them out into > >>an antlib of their own? > >> > > > > Because its based only on (new) standard classes I would do that as > > core tasks. And as an adoption of , so the user doesn

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200

RE: Task for the new Pack200 format

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Because its based only on (new) standard classes I > would do that as > core tasks. And as an adoption of , so the user > doesn´t has to > create the JAR bofore "pack200"ing. +1 -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!?

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200

Re: Task for the new Pack200 format

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And as an adoption of , so the user doesn´t has to create the > JAR bofore "pack200"ing. Yes, sounds useful. In particular since the Pack200 class deals with streams, so we could create the initial jar in m

RE: Task for the new Pack200 format

> Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which > basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very > effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is > to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack2

Task for the new Pack200 format

Hi, Java 1.5 comes with support for a new archive format Pack200[1] which basically works by using a special compression algorithm that is very effective on Java class files. The way to create such an archive is to create a plain old jar first and then turn ot into a Pack200 archive - "depa