On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I suppose that chain of events would suggest that the answer to
> your question is "yes", though "finally understood" makes the Ant
> committers sound like a bunch of dinosaurs. ;)
>
>
--- Russell Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:35:06 -0800 (PST), Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> > tasks). Unless I have misunderstood it
> dependencies
> > is more Maven-centric than so I feel
[SNIP]
> I believe that you did misunderstand it. The
> task i
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:35:06 -0800 (PST), Matt Benson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When Russell first brought his dependencies task to
> the table, I reiterated the general policy regarding
> the introduction of new tasks, especially where they
> interacted with software other than Ant (aka optional
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(edited for brevity)
> > See:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10935231277&r=1&w=2
> > (particularly DD's response)
> > and
>
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=109882328509244&w=2
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Matt Benson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > It's a sign of the times...
>>
>>
>
> See:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10935231277&r=1&w=2
> (p
I think that for this to be really usefull, one would need to
use the task.
See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28228
It does have some issues (sub-projects affecting
the main project, and when ant is used in an ide)
but it's benifits outweigh the drawbacks..
For example:
jun
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:22:40 -0600, Groboclown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:27:12 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Also, and this is important, you dont need to use it to download
stuff.
> > Instead you can use it to manage libraries that you depend on
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:27:12 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, and this is important, you dont need to use it to download stuff.
> Instead you can use it to manage libraries that you depend on. (We may
> want to change behaviour to say if you dont specify a repository, that
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's a sign of the times...
>
>
See:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10935231277&r=1&w=2
(particularly DD's response)
and
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=109882
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a sign of the times...
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:27:12 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One thing I can't find is why this is being put into ant core and not
> > an optional task. Could anyone help me out here? Thanks.
>
> It's a bootstrapping thing. If its optional, well, its optional so it
> may
>
> One thing I can't find is why this is being put into ant core and not
> an optional task. Could anyone help me out here? Thanks.
It's a bootstrapping thing. If its optional, well, its optional so it
may not be there. Which makes it a lot harder to use the task to
retrieve optional stuff.
It's a sign of the times...
-Matt
--- Groboclown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been out of the Ant developer discussions for
> about two or three
> months now (way too much going on), and I'm trying
> to get caught up on
> the repository task.
>
> One thing I can't find is why this is being
I've been out of the Ant developer discussions for about two or three
months now (way too much going on), and I'm trying to get caught up on
the repository task.
One thing I can't find is why this is being put into ant core and not
an optional task. Could anyone help me out here? Thanks.
--
-M
14 matches
Mail list logo
