AW: JavaFront: use of nested elements

>Works for me now. Cool :-) Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JavaFront: use of nested elements

On 2008-11-10, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CMD: concat + fileset dir src includes *.properties - + header # Ant > Version ${ant.version} - + footer # End of text > > --- > Problem: failed to create task o

AW: JavaFront: use of nested elements

I added support for AntLibs ... Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Montag, 10. November 2008 13:13 >An: dev@ant.apache.org >Betreff: JavaFront: use of nested elements > >I have rewritten the command line p

JavaFront: use of nested elements

I have rewritten the command line parsing to support the use of nested elements and text like Hello World The examples now show the XML-Syntax followed by the command line. But the last example doesnt work: XML: Ant Version ${ant.version} End

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40621] - Order of addXand addconfiguredX nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40621] - Order of addXand addconfiguredX nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40621] - Order of addXand addconfiguredX nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40621] - Order of addXand addconfiguredX nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40621] New: - Order of addXand addconfiguredX nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40621 Summary: Order of addXand addconfiguredX nested elements Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36217] - macrodef and nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36217] - macrodef and nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36217] - macrodef and nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36217] - macrodef and nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36217] New: - macrodef and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36217 Summary: macrodef and nested elements Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33151] - fileset with attributes does not the same as fileset with nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33151] - fileset with attributes does not the same as fileset with nested elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33151] New: - fileset with attributes does not the same as fileset with nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33151 Summary: fileset with attributes does not the same as fileset with nested elements Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29499] - does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29499 does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29499] - does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29499 does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29499] - does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29499 does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Major

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29499] - does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29499 does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-10 16:04 --- The first problem is a consequence of the way namespace handling is done in ant 1.6.0 and ant.6.1 One needs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29499] New: - does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29499 does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements Summary: does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements Product: Ant Version: 1.6.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Statu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29499] - does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29499 does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-10 15:26 --- Created an attachment (id=11816) Log of running the three targets using Ant 1.6.1; note failure in test-2, as well as strange failure m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29499] - does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29499 does not appear to work with both URI and nested elements --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-10 15:24 --- Created an attachment (id=11815) Test script; try running targets 'both', '

Re: 1.6.2: Namespace uri of nested elements

Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wouldn't this here work? no (in ant 1.6.1) see: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=107763945224538&w=2 A nested element discovered by reflection is looked up in

RE: 1.6.2: Namespace uri of nested elements

> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >wouldn't this here work? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no (in ant 1.6.1) see: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=107763945224538&w=2 > > >A nested element discovered by

Re: 1.6.2: Namespace uri of nested elements

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 09 Jun 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the 1.6 beta discussion, it was decided that the nested elements of these tasks should also have the same xml ns as the tasks themselves. The reason for this was consistency. "consistency with

Re: 1.6.2: Namespace uri of nested elements

On Wed, 09 Jun 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the 1.6 beta discussion, it was decided that the nested > elements of these tasks should also have the same xml ns as > the tasks themselves. The reason for this was consistency. "consistency with the wa

1.6.2: Namespace uri of nested elements

in an antlib without worrying about another antlib that the same build file may use also contain a "deploy" task. In the 1.6 beta discussion, it was decided that the nested elements of these tasks should also have the same xml ns as the tasks themselves. The reason for this was consistency. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29280] - javac is requireing srcdir even with nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29280 javac is requireing srcdir even with nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29280] New: - javac is requireing srcdir even with nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29280 javac is requireing srcdir even with nested elements Summary: javac is requireing srcdir even with nested elements Product: Ant Version: 1.6.1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Statu

Re: nested elements in antlibs

st it does for me: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>in an antlib at package test > >>and used: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>

Re: nested elements in antlibs

: Matt Benson wrote: I am finding that I cannot define the following in an antlib: and reference it with a namespace, due to the fact that the nested elements keep the default namespace, even using the notation. Since presets are pre-created, I

Re: nested elements in antlibs

> > > > in an antlib at package test > and used: > > > > > > > Matt Benson wrote: > > >I am finding that I cannot define the following in > an > >antlib: > > > > > > > > > > &g

Re: nested elements in antlibs

That should work, at least it does for me: in an antlib at package test and used: Matt Benson wrote: I am finding that I cannot define the following in an antlib: and reference it with a namespace, due to the fact that the nested elements keep the default

nested elements in antlibs

I am finding that I cannot define the following in an antlib: and reference it with a namespace, due to the fact that the nested elements keep the default namespace, even using the notation. Since presets are pre-created, I guess I can understand how this is happening... should it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26563] - Scriptdef task doesn't handle the nested elements properly

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26563 Scriptdef task doesn't handle the nested elements properly [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26563] New: - Scriptdef task doesn't handle the nested elements properly

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26563 Scriptdef task doesn't handle the nested elements properly Summary: Scriptdef task doesn't handle the nested elements properly Product: Ant Version: 1.6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Other

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] - PATCH: should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 PATCH: should support nested elements --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-07 17:54 --- The reason I didn't hit the tests is that there were no existing tests for filesets either; sorry for the extra inconvenience. Thanks for yo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] - PATCH: should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 PATCH: should support nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] - PATCH: should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 PATCH: should support nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary| should support |PATCH:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] - should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 should support nested elements --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-19 16:26 --- Can I interest any committers in this minor but useful enhancement for 1.6.1? ;) - To unsub

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] - should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 should support nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.6Beta

Re: Bug 23526: should support nested elements

Matt Benson wrote: Has anyone had a look at this stuff? It's a very minor change, but since it's an enhancement I'm guessing it's not going to make 1.6. What will it take to get it added to the 1.7 tree (assuming it can't make 1.6)? It'll go into 1.7, barring any objections from anyone. I know it

Bug 23526: should support nested elements

Has anyone had a look at this stuff? It's a very minor change, but since it's an enhancement I'm guessing it's not going to make 1.6. What will it take to get it added to the 1.7 tree (assuming it can't make 1.6)? -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping -

Re: should support nested elements

Conor: The patch seems to be good in spite of the slight refactoring; the (somewhat superficial) unit tests still pass and it has behaved as expected... so what now? Is there a hope for this kind of enhancement in 1.6 now that the beta has been released? -Matt __

Re: should allow nested elements

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:50 am, Matt Benson wrote: > > It does and has for a while according to CVS. Is > > there a problem? > > > > Conor > > This is allowed: > > > > > > which is nice. > > As far as I can tell, this is not allowed: > > > > > Sorry Matt, I didn't read the subject carefully

Re: should allow nested elements

> It does and has for a while according to CVS. Is > there a problem? > Conor This is allowed: which is nice. As far as I can tell, this is not allowed: Which means that, counter to Unix-users' intuition, can only create new files one at a time. Just wanted to check whether ther

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] - should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 should support nested elements --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-30 17:08 --- Created an attachment (id=8399) patch for the manual page - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] - should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 should support nested elements --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-30 17:08 --- Created an attachment (id=8398) patch for support - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23526] New: - should support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526 should support nested elements Summary: should support nested elements Product: Ant Version: 1.6Beta Platform: All OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority:

Re: should allow nested elements

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 05:27 am, Matt Benson wrote: > ... any reason why not? > It does and has for a while according to CVS. Is there a problem? Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [

should allow nested elements

... any reason why not? __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mai

Re: Nested elements

I succed with Ant, Thank you all for your help. Andrei - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Nested elements

lp me? - Original Message - From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Nested elements You should ask help from the person who wrote the uni-d task. The source code o

RE: Nested elements

And the link to Eriks article http://www.fawcette.com/javapro/2003_02/magazine/features/ehatcher/default_p f.asp Jan > -Original Message- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:34 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re:

Re: Nested elements

lp me? - Original Message - From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Nested elements You should ask help from the person who wrote the uni-d task. The source code o

Re: Nested elements

at to write there. Can you help me? - Original Message - From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Nested elements > You should ask help from th

RE: Nested elements

ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:01 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Nested elements > > > You should ask help from the person who wrote the uni-d task. > The source code of uni-d task should have an addConfig method. > There should

Re: Nested elements

August 20, 2003 3:53 PM Subject: Nested elements > I have a task called uni-d > > >classname="be.unid.generate.AntTask" >classpath="${unid.dir}/uni-d.jar" >classpathref="task.path" >

Nested elements

I have a task called uni-d and here i use it: This task add's the values for attributes: appdir; definition; outputdir; spackage; template in the config section of a ini

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18995] - Feature Request: task and/or data type to support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18995 Feature Request: task and/or data type to support nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18995] - Feature Request: task and/or data type to support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18995 Feature Request: task and/or data type to support nested elements [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18995] New: - Feature Request: task and/or data type to support nested elements

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18995 Feature Request: task and/or data type to support nested elements Summary: Feature Request: task and/or data type to support nested elements Product: Ant Version: 1.5.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: