On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday I said that macrodef attributes should be implemented as
> properties and not as textual substitution.
>
> On overnight reflection, I have changed by mind.
Cool, that makes two of us 8-)
> The proposed new notation is @{x}
essage-
> From: Peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 11/27/2003 7:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject: Macrodef attributes and Local revisited again
> Yesterday I said that macrodef attributes should be implemented as
> properties
t;
Or are you talking about properties defined within the execution of a "call" to
a macrodef?
-Original Message-
From: Peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/27/2003 7:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Macrodef attributes and Local revis
Yesterday I said that macrodef attributes should be implemented as
properties and not as textual substitution.
On overnight reflection, I have changed by mind.
MacroDef has been using textual substitution in the ant beta
builds without much problems (*.. well not quite see below).
The only issue
