Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
original :
Copyright (c) 1999 2001-2002 The Apache Software Foundation
output :
Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation
But Antoine, I've asked recently about this on the Ant li
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
original :
Copyright (c) 1999 2001-2002 The Apache Software Foundation
output :
Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation
But Antoine, I've asked recently about this on the Ant list,
and was told one should
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
original :
Copyright (c) 1999 2001-2002 The Apache Software Foundation
output :
Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation
But Antoine, I've asked recently about this on the Ant list,
and was told one should
bruary 03, 2004 4:20 PM
> To: 'Ant Developers List'; Gump code and data
> Subject: RE: License updates needed
>
>
> > From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > original :
> > Copyright (c) 1999 2001-2002 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> original :
> Copyright (c) 1999 2001-2002 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> output :
> Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation
But Antoine, I've asked recently about this on the Ant list,
and was told one should list only the ye
> I have changed the script relicense/relicense.py so that the *first*
> original copyright year is retained.
> The last year will always be 2004 (or 2005 if someone runs the script
> next year, ...)
>
> example
> original :
> Copyright (c) 1999 2001-2002 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> output :
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I did a licensing audit. There's some things needing doing:
* The Java sources should be updated with the new ASL 2.0 header;
* the new ASL 2.0 license should be added to gump cvs along with a
NOTICE fil
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
>
> > I did a licensing audit. There's some things needing doing:
> >
> > * The Java sources should be updated with the new ASL 2.0 header;
> > * the new ASL 2.0 license should be added to gump cvs along with a
> > NOTICE file;
Leo Simons wrote:
I did a licensing audit. There's some things needing doing:
* The Java sources should be updated with the new ASL 2.0 header;
* the new ASL 2.0 license should be added to gump cvs along with a
NOTICE file;
* many of the python sourcefiles should get the new ASL 2.0
license hea
