Re: JunitTestRunner commit

2018-04-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-04-05, Maarten Coene wrote: > I think I finally got it merged into the 1.9.x branch... yes, looks good. > (Where are the days where everything was so easy with SVN ;-)) I've maintained svn branches long enough to recall merging is a pain regardless of which SCM you use :-) > I did a li

Re: JunitTestRunner commit

2018-04-05 Thread Maarten Coene
tatic initializer. thanks,Maarten Van: Stefan Bodewig Aan: dev@ant.apache.org Verzonden: donderdag 5 april 8:25 2018 Onderwerp: Re: JunitTestRunner commit On 2018-04-04, Maarten Coene wrote: > Since this is more or less my first commit to the Ant codebase, could > someone please revie

Re: JunitTestRunner commit

2018-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-04-04, Maarten Coene wrote: > Since this is more or less my first commit to the Ant codebase, could > someone please review my change to JunitTestRunner ? Typo in WHATSNEW (until rather than untill). I think the change is good, although I'm not sure whether there is a difference in how a

JunitTestRunner commit

2018-04-04 Thread Maarten Coene
Hi, Since this is more or less my first commit to the Ant codebase, could someone please review my change to JunitTestRunner ?And if all is ok, what is the correct way to merge this into the 1.9.x branch? Maarten