On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know i have not been really active for some time now
don't worry, we all have times where we can contribute more and times
when we can't do as much as we wanted to.
> The choice should not only be based on what new language fea
Hello
I know i have not been really active for some time now (changed house,
then job) yet I manage to remember previous discussions.
I still feel that the following reasoning is flawed:
There has been some discussion about dropping support for Java 1.3 in
trunk. One of the aguments against
5:02:40 PM
Subject: Re: Java version required for trunk
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Jeffrey E. Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think moving to 1.4 is fine; I'm actually kind of surprised that
> we've even go that low. Do we have a sense that people are still out
> there in the
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Jeffrey E. Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think moving to 1.4 is fine; I'm actually kind of surprised that
> we've even go that low. Do we have a sense that people are still out
> there in the wild using JDK 1.4?
I'm one of them myself, stuck with a customer who has fina
> From: Jeffrey E Care [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:32 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: Java version required for trunk
>
> I think moving to 1.4 is fine; I'm actually kind of surprised that
> we've
> even go that l
>Do we have a sense that people are still out
>there in the wild using JDK 1.4?
Yes - in my project we are using Fujitsu-Siemens BeanTA application
server
(I dont know the exact version), which relies on Java 1.4. :-(
(EJB 2.0 .)
Jan
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/15/2008 12:31:21 AM:
> [snip]
>
> There has been some discussion about dropping support for Java 1.3 in
> trunk. One of the aguments against it was that 1.4 doesn't offer
> anything new and going from 1.3 to Java5 was too big a step.
>
> Given that
>this is not a vote, more of a poll to see whether there'd be a chance
>for consensus.
>
>Ant 1.7.1 dropped support for Java 1.2 somewhat officially, we voted
>to drop support but never made that decision public.
>
>There has been some discussion about dropping support for Java 1.3 in
>trunk. One
Hi,
> There has been some discussion about dropping support for Java 1.3 in
> trunk. One of the aguments against it was that 1.4 doesn't offer
> anything new and going from 1.3 to Java5 was too big a step.
I'd personally argue that Java5 doesn't really offer very much apart
from window dressing,
Hi all,
this is not a vote, more of a poll to see whether there'd be a chance
for consensus.
Ant 1.7.1 dropped support for Java 1.2 somewhat officially, we voted
to drop support but never made that decision public.
There has been some discussion about dropping support for Java 1.3 in
trunk. One
10 matches
Mail list logo
