Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task [net]

2004-02-18 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Cohen writes: >This is all true, Daniel, but I think the initial motivation of Dominique >Devienne was to REMOVE the requirement that oro be on ant's runtime classpath I wrote: >wrapper and J2SE 1.4 autodetection, in which case I would hope the point >would

Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task [net]

2004-02-18 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dom inique Devienne writes: >Probably not... I simply try to avoid having twice the same functionality on >my classpath, and JDK1.4+ fulfills my regexp needs (albeit simple) just >fine. I've read a few times that ORO is superior to the JDK's regexp impl, >so it's no

RE: Incorrect documentation of FTP task [net]

2004-02-18 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is all true, Daniel, but I think the initial motivation of Dominique > Devienne was to REMOVE the requirement that oro be on ant's runtime > classpath when running the ftp taks, not to make oro a central > dispatch point for other regex proces

Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task [net]

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Cohen
This is all true, Daniel, but I think the initial motivation of Dominique Devienne was to REMOVE the requirement that oro be on ant's runtime classpath when running the ftp taks, not to make oro a central dispatch point for other regex processors. In case it wasn't clear, I don't really support

Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task [net]

2004-02-18 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Cohen writes: >You've built an interface to encapsulate the choice in regex implementations >with automatic checking. Sweet! Perhaps we could port it to commons-net - ... >Perhaps this checker mechanism could be ported to commons (a la >commons-logging).

Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task [net]

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Cohen
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 8:27 pm, Steve Cohen wrote: > On Tuesday 17 February 2004 10:11 am, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > While it is true that the CVS HEAD of commons-net is required and while > > > it is > > > true that jakarta-oro is

Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task [net]

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Cohen
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 10:11 am, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > While it is true that the CVS HEAD of commons-net is required and while > > it is > > true that jakarta-oro is required (jakarta-oro is now required for any > > uses > > of the ft

RE: Incorrect documentation of FTP task

2004-02-17 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > While it is true that the CVS HEAD of commons-net is required and while it > is > true that jakarta-oro is required (jakarta-oro is now required for any > uses > of the ftp task using commons-net), I don't believe it is true that 2.0.8 > of > oro i

Re: Incorrect documentation of FTP task

2004-02-17 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Steve Cohen wrote: I see that someone has tried to incorporate my suggestion for using the latest commons-net.jar in order to use ant's task with NT-based servers. It was me. O:-) However, the documentation is not quite correct. It says: "To use the FTP task with Microsoft FTP servers, you

Incorrect documentation of FTP task

2004-02-17 Thread Steve Cohen
I see that someone has tried to incorporate my suggestion for using the latest commons-net.jar in order to use ant's task with NT-based servers. However, the documentation is not quite correct. It says: "To use the FTP task with Microsoft FTP servers, you need CVS HEAD of commons-net and jak