Re: IdeaJ

2007-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Benson wrote: FTR, since I had sent a note to the list announcing my intent to use IDEA on my MBP, I eval'd IDEA and it informed me of random problems that didn't really exist. I then attempted to use NetBeans but its app

Re: IdeaJ

2007-04-23 Thread Matt Benson
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > FTR, since I had sent a note to the list > announcing my > > intent to use IDEA on my MBP, I eval'd IDEA and it > > informed me of random problems that didn't really > > exist. I then attempted to use NetBeans but its > > appa

Re: IdeaJ

2007-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: FTR, since I had sent a note to the list announcing my intent to use IDEA on my MBP, I eval'd IDEA and it informed me of random problems that didn't really exist. I then attempted to use NetBeans but its apparent lack of a workspace concept (feel free to show me where I'm wron

Re: IdeaJ

2007-04-21 Thread Matt Benson
FTR, since I had sent a note to the list announcing my intent to use IDEA on my MBP, I eval'd IDEA and it informed me of random problems that didn't really exist. I then attempted to use NetBeans but its apparent lack of a workspace concept (feel free to show me where I'm wrong here, anyone) was n

IdeaJ

2007-04-20 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi all, There may be a flurry of minor commits from me in the next few days as I try to work out the weird way that IntelliJ IDEA works - I'm not impressed so far with the project/module structure, and the svn handling is strange too. So if you see tiny little changes being committed, it's becau