On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Which parts of AntUnit would you use?
>> Only the assertions or the tasks and listeners as well?
>
> Currently we are only interested in asserts library.
Which is pretty easy to ke
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
If there is enough interest we could certainly still create a 1.6
compatible branch.
From this posting I got a reply from Paul King, who explained that
similar asserts are being used in WebTest project and that he would
be interested to learn the outcome of this discussion.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide
an open source testing framework for the enterprise.
[...]
The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are
planning to open
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:14 AM
> To: dev@ant.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide
> an open source testing framework for the enterprise.
[...]
> The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are
> planning to open source when we rea
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:33 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:33 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
>
> Vladimir Egorov wrote:
> > Sorry for a bit of a messy ent
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I did not realize that
using html email could be a problem. Thanks Stephan for pointing this
out.
My inquiry is in connection with TestLogic project on CodeShare.
Could you please expand a little on TestLogic for the rest
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I did not realize that
using html email could be a problem. Thanks Stephan for pointing this
out.
> > My inquiry is in connection with TestLogic project on CodeShare.
> Could you please expand a little on TestLogic for the rest of the Ant
developers
On 10/23/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
If there is enough interest we could certainly still create a 1.6
compatible branch. The question is more about maintenence, commiting
fixes and enhancements to two branches is a pain.
We may need two branches in any case - one for an
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My messages to dev@ant.apache.org keep bouncing. I attached the
> bounced message at the bottom. Am I using the correct alias?
You are.
Some context for all of [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Vladimir asked for an Ant 1.6.5
compatible branch o
esending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My original email bounced with "mailbox
full" error (unfortunately I lost it).
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:06 PM
To: Vladimir Egorov
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compat
12 matches
Mail list logo
