Many many thanks for taking the time to explain it in so much detail,
Jean-Louis.
I now understand that plugins, buildtypes and skeletons are not well
suited to be distributed in a Maven formatted, POM enforcing environment
like Maven Central
No objections from me again using bintray, you've conv
from me.
> >> My objections were for "ASF plugins" not for "outside ASF" ;)
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >>> Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de]
> >>> Gese
ot;ASF plugins" not for "outside ASF" ;)
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de]
>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2013 10:06
>>> An: Ant Developers List
>>> Betreff: Re: E
On 2013-05-03, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote:
> No objections either if both Apache & non Apache plugins are on
> bintray ? :p
Then I must admit I misunderstood your proposal. Why do we need a
separate distribution point for ASF released EasyAnt plugins?
Maybe you need to enlighten those of us who h
t; Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de]
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2013 10:06
> > An: Ant Developers List
> > Betreff: Re: Evaluating Bintray as a distribution platform for easyant
> > plugins
> >
> > Hello Jean-Louis,
> >
> > I was not a
Neither from me.
My objections were for "ASF plugins" not for "outside ASF" ;)
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2013 10:06
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Evaluating
Hello Jean-Louis,
I was not aware of bintray, I have just looked at the web site.
No objections from me.
Regards,
Antoine
On May 3, 2013, at 2:14 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote:
> No objections? :p
> Le 29 avr. 2013 20:59, "Jean-Louis Boudart" a
> écrit :
>
>> Here is the original thread from
No objections? :p
Le 29 avr. 2013 20:59, "Jean-Louis Boudart" a
écrit :
> Here is the original thread from easyant-dev ML during apache incubation :
> http://markmail.org/thread/uv2xkj63rkdh2thh
> Le 29 avr. 2013 20:53, "Jean-Louis Boudart"
> a écrit :
>
>>
>> > I would prefer having the artifa
Here is the original thread from easyant-dev ML during apache incubation :
http://markmail.org/thread/uv2xkj63rkdh2thh
Le 29 avr. 2013 20:53, "Jean-Louis Boudart"
a écrit :
>
> > I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF servers. A (Nexus based)
> > repository is at https://repository.apache.or
> I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF servers. A (Nexus based)
> repository is at https://repository.apache.org/
> Ant + Ivy are available at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/
I would also prefer this but will ASF authorize "non apache project" (read
plugins wit
On 2013-04-29, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
>> I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF servers. A (Nexus based)
>> repository is at https://repository.apache.org/ Ant + Ivy are available
>> at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/
> Oh - I mean that only for "ASF plugins".
> > We currently have our own repostory (repository.easyant.org) hosted
> on
> > a private server. I would prefer to switch to a more reliable
> > repository like bintray. No need to worry about backup, disaster
> > recovery. We could just focus on content.
>
> I would prefer having the artifacts
> We currently have our own repostory (repository.easyant.org) hosted on
> a private server. I would prefer to switch to a more reliable
> repository like bintray. No need to worry about backup, disaster
> recovery. We could just focus on content.
I would prefer having the artifacts on ASF servers
Dear EasyAnters,
I've been working on sonar integration as a plugin for easyant.
Source are hosted on github :https://github.com/easyant/sonar-easyant-plugin
.
Since a few weeks, JFrog (guys behind Artifactory) opened a new online
service for OpenSourcers : Bintray.
Bintray is a social service fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
