- Original Message -
From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 22:42
Subject: Re: DynamicTag
> The "first place" was a very long time ago and there was a lot o
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:55 am, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> 2) DynamicTag is lazy, thanks to UnknownElement. Your rewrite is creating
> the element at parse-time, my implementation does it only at runtime.
> Again, I favor delaying the instantiation and configuration. Ant should
> never
Dominique Devienne wrote:
> 2) DynamicTag is lazy, thanks to UnknownElement. Your rewrite is creating
> the element at parse-time, my implementation does it only at runtime.
> Again, I favor delaying the instantiation and configuration. Ant should
> never have mingled parsing of
Dominique Devienne wrote:
>>Interesting... So how come DynamicTag is not compatible with
>>Ant 1.6, when it compiles and works fine with 1.5.1??? Sounds
>>like an incompatible API change to me, which hopefully will be fixed.
It compiles on Ant 1.6, but currently the unknownele
Interesting... So how come DynamicTag is not compatible with Ant 1.6, when
it compiles and works fine with 1.5.1??? Sounds like an incompatible API
change to me, which hopefully will be fixed.
I have a few remarks:
1) I favor composition over inheritance. DynamicTag is designed to be
composed
Hi, I am on holidays, but have followed
this thread.
I have been playing with DynamicTag and it is
quite neat, but there are some issues with it..
I have made some modifications (well rewrite...)
1) DynamicTag uses UnknownElement. This part of ant code is
undergoing a number of changes at the
