Re: AW: Dynamic property names

2008-11-04 Thread Matt Benson
--- Remie Bolte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the input! > > I found a different way to deal with the problem, > without hacks :) > Sometimes it is useful not to be able to find a > solution, it allows you to > look back a couple of steps. > > However, I do still have the question why

Re: AW: Dynamic property names

2008-11-04 Thread Gilbert Rebhan
Remie Bolte schrieb: > Thanks for the input! > > I found a different way to deal with the problem, without hacks :) > Sometimes it is useful not to be able to find a solution, it allows you to > look back a couple of steps. hack != bad IMO i use that term for a tricky solution or workaround when

Re: AW: Dynamic property names

2008-11-04 Thread Remie Bolte
Thanks for the input! I found a different way to deal with the problem, without hacks :) Sometimes it is useful not to be able to find a solution, it allows you to look back a couple of steps. However, I do still have the question why double expanding is not implemented. Is there a conceptual iss

Re: AW: Dynamic property names

2008-11-04 Thread Gilbert Rebhan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> I saw the FAQ, but the workaround deals with making a new >> property, which is >> not something that is desirable in my situation. >> Is there a reason that double expanding is not implemented? > > There is an implementation in the sandbox bundled as an AntLib. > Yo

AW: Dynamic property names

2008-11-03 Thread Jan.Materne
>I saw the FAQ, but the workaround deals with making a new >property, which is >not something that is desirable in my situation. >Is there a reason that double expanding is not implemented? There is an implementation in the sandbox bundled as an AntLib. You could give it try: Root http://svn.ap

Re: Dynamic property names

2008-11-03 Thread Remie Bolte
Hi, I saw the FAQ, but the workaround deals with making a new property, which is not something that is desirable in my situation. Is there a reason that double expanding is not implemented? Cheers, Remie On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:53 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Is it possible to resolve a

AW: Dynamic property names

2008-11-02 Thread Jan.Materne
>Is it possible to resolve a property name like this > >${${prefix}.someproperty} > >making the prefix variable? see http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#propertyvalue-as-name-for-property Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Dynamic property names

2008-10-31 Thread Remie Bolte
Hi, Is it possible to resolve a property name like this ${${prefix}.someproperty} making the prefix variable? Cheers, Remie