Re: Code Copyright

2004-01-08 Thread Steve Loughran
Conor MacNeill wrote: Conor, are you still using the Taligent guide as your reference programming guide :) At least upgrade to its successor, that IBM Java framework, whatever its name was. What about Pink? No I don't use the book day to day :-). I was thinking about the San Francisco framework. I

RE: Code Copyright

2004-01-08 Thread Conor MacNeill
> > Conor, are you still using the Taligent guide as your reference > programming guide :) > > At least upgrade to its successor, that IBM Java framework, whatever its > name was. > What about Pink? No I don't use the book day to day :-). I did remember it had a little styleguide in it. You do rea

Re: Code Copyright

2004-01-08 Thread Steve Loughran
Conor MacNeill wrote: This is from my "Taligent Guide to Designing Programs" Conor, are you still using the Taligent guide as your reference programming guide :) At least upgrade to its successor, that IBM Java framework, whatever its name was. -steve ---

RE: Code Copyright

2004-01-07 Thread Conor MacNeill
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 8 January 2004 2:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Code Copyright > > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm looking at your Happy New Year com

Re: Code Copyright

2004-01-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking at your Happy New Year commit, and wonder about the > rational behind not listing years the source was not changed; I don't understand American Copyright law even remotely well enough to actually tell you 8-) I've be

Code Copyright

2004-01-07 Thread Dominique Devienne
Hi Stefan, I'm looking at your Happy New Year commit, and wonder about the rational behind not listing years the source was not changed; - * Copyright (c) 2000-2001,2003 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights + * Copyright (c) 2000-2001,2003-2004 The Apache Software Foundation. All righ