Can't check.xml it from the Maven repository ;-) --DD
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: Checkstyle Audit
>
> And you need the
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:10 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> > I am a beotian with xml/xsl.
> > How do you run the style sheets yourself against the source
> code of ant ?
> > Antoine
>
> Had to look that one up. The check.xml file contains all the
> tasks necessary
> to run the a
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:10 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> I am a beotian with xml/xsl.
> How do you run the style sheets yourself against the source code of ant ?
> Antoine
Had to look that one up. The check.xml file contains all the tasks necessary
to run the audit.
Conor
--
It sounds good. I wish I would know something about Gump to be able to help.
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Checkstyle Au
On 04 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am surprised you do not see the tooltips
I do now - and I'm no longer surprised. I must have disabled tooltips
some time ago, can't remember why and when.
Sorry for the noise
Stefan
---
I am surprised you do not see the tooltips
The mozilla page
http://www.mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html
makes a little song and dance over suporting
tooltips for the title attribute.
Peter
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 12:50, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The pages validate by w3c.org so maybe a bug in Mozilla 1.4?
I don't think that the W3C tests whether the title attribute generates
a tooltip 8-)
Peter says that it works for him, which is strange. I'll simply
accept it as an incon
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:51 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Works on Mozilla 1.2.1 on Linux :-( It is just a title attribute in
> > an anchor with no href.
>
> It seems as if the href was required for it to work in 1.4.
>
The pages val
I just downloaded mozilla 1.4, and the tooltips
work fine on Linux.
Peter
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 11:51, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Works on Mozilla 1.2.1 on Linux :-( It is just a title attribute in
> > an anchor with no href.
>
>
Hi Conor,
I am a beotian with xml/xsl.
How do you run the style sheets yourself against the source code of ant ?
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Checkstyle
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Works on Mozilla 1.2.1 on Linux :-( It is just a title attribute in
> an anchor with no href.
It seems as if the href was required for it to work in 1.4.
Stefan
-
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:26 pm, peter reilly wrote:
> If that is done, the java-docs should also be included.
>
> In any case, it is easy to run the check locally (once
> one figures out that ant -f check.xml checkstyle needs
> to be run before ant -f check.xml ;-)
> Peter
>
:-) I just did that while
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > If you hover over a line in the detail report it will show which
> > checkstyle module triggered the report.
>
> Doesn't seem to work for Mozilla 1.4 on Linux.
>
Works on Mozi
> > It's ad-hoc at the moment. What I would like is to create
> an ant-site or
> > ant-reports project in Gump and run it nightly from there.
> It would need more
> > work on the HTML generation from the generated xdocs. It could also
> > incorporate the xdocs manual generation. We may need to
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you hover over a line in the detail report it will show which
> checkstyle module triggered the report.
Doesn't seem to work for Mozilla 1.4 on Linux.
Stefan
-
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 11:23, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 05:32 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> >
> > actually, it might be even better if the pages were generated by a cron job
> > running daily, or even better, if a kind of cvs commit daemon would
> > regenerate the
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 05:32 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> actually, it might be even better if the pages were generated by a cron job
> running daily, or even better, if a kind of cvs commit daemon would
> regenerate the pages corresponding to each changed source file.
>
It's ad-hoc
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: Checkstyle Audit
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 01:15 am, peter reilly wrote:
> > Excellent work.
> > I have a problem with three rules:
> >
> >
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 01:15 am, peter reilly wrote:
> Excellent work.
> I have a problem with three rules:
>
>major: The "DesignForExtensionCheck" seems a bit silly.
>minor: The "LeftCurlyCheck" is against my in-house rule that
> if there is a multi line condition, the { should be
>
minor: "RedundantThrowsCheck: It complains about BuildException.
So is it prefered to eliminate the throws BuildException? or keep it?
I'm willing to fix my code if I know what is actually desired here.
Gus
-
To unsubscribe, e
I know ...
Ah well,
Peter
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 16:30, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 03 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >minor: The "LeftCurlyCheck" is against my in-house rule that
> > if there is a multi line condition, the { should be
> > on a separa
On 03 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>minor: The "LeftCurlyCheck" is against my in-house rule that
> if there is a multi line condition, the { should be
> on a separate line - but I can live the rule.
You inhouse rule is against Ant's coding style, which
I can live the rule.
minor: "RedundantThrowsCheck: It complains about BuildException.
Peter
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 15:26, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> I've done a checkstyle audit with the new xdoc generating stylesheets and
> uploaded this to the server
>
> http://ant.apache.or
I've done a checkstyle audit with the new xdoc generating stylesheets and
uploaded this to the server
http://ant.apache.org/reports/checkstyle/
It's not linked into the rest of the site (nor is it in CVS). It's mainly just
for interest at the moment. It does show which
24 matches
Mail list logo
