On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 12:06 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
that reminds me, we need a way in xdocs of telling xdoclet to not list
tasks, else it pulls in these intermediate classes too.
This is already part of it. @ant.task ignore="true"
Erik
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christoph Wilhelms
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed
elements should be listed in the defaults.properties
Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or
utterly, totally deprect
Hi Stefan and all!
> > To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed
> > elements should be listed in the defaults.properties
>
> Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or
> utterly, totally deprected and removed task - the classes are still
> there for
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christoph Wilhelms
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed
> elements should be listed in the defaults.properties
Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or
utterly, totally deprected and removed tas
Hi all!
I am still improving ANTidote and as I am developing better
Task/Type-Element-support I came over this topic.
As you might know ANTidote as well as the NetBeans-Ant-integration uses the
defaults.properties in the packages taskdefs and types to introspect an
initial amount of tasks and typ
