Thanks for the update, Stefan!
Matt
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-09-05, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > So for a long time (starting after I had made a bunch of Java 5
> > upgrades--at least I think they were upgrades) Ant builds were failing in
> > Gump.
>
> The bu
On 2013-09-05, Matt Benson wrote:
> So for a long time (starting after I had made a bunch of Java 5
> upgrades--at least I think they were upgrades) Ant builds were failing in
> Gump.
The builds don't fail. There is a single test in test-ant that fails
every second or third run.
> I haven't see
So for a long time (starting after I had made a bunch of Java 5
upgrades--at least I think they were upgrades) Ant builds were failing in
Gump. I haven't seen those notices for quite some time now, so are they
cleared up or simply turned off?
Matt
Hi all,
Attached is my status report on the Ant project which I have just sent
to the ASF board. If anyone has comments or questions, please feel free
to let us know.
Status Report for the Ant project
o Ant 1.6.3
Ant 1.6.3 was released on April 28 2005
A large number of changes were included in
Hi all,
I am preparing the report to the ASF board on the Ant project status. I will
post a draft here soon but would welcome any comments or issues that people
wish to raise.
Conor
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
resistance... That's OK. I'm now standing on the side line, waiting to see
where all this 'discussion' will lead. --DD
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 2:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
+1 to the report as a whole.
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> While active, the discussion has not been heated and the community
> appears healthy.
The most important piece to me.
Stefan
Status Report for the Ant project
o Ant 1.5.2
Ant 1.5.2 was released on March 3, 2003
The zip refactoring that was undertaken to eliminate a number of zip/jar
update bugs introduced a regression whereby some elements of the produced
Zips could not be viewed by WinZIP. This required a followup
