2003 09:59
An: Ant Developers List
Cc: Steve Cohen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Ant 1.6 local and macrodef attributes
The work-around [EMAIL PROTECTED] will work.
prop.name is @{prop.name} prop value is
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
expansion. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Kjome [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 11/28/2003 6:39 PM
To: Ant Users List
Cc:
Subject:RE: Ant 1.6 local and macrodef attributes
Thanks for explaining
e-
From: Jacob Kjome [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 11/28/2003 6:39 PM
To: Ant Users List
Cc:
Subject:RE: Ant 1.6 local and macrodef attributes
Thanks for explaining that Peter.
I took a look and found your latest proposal here...
&
ease correct me if I'm wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 11/28/2003 6:39 PM
To: Ant Users List
Cc:
Subject: RE: Ant 1.6 local and macrodef attributes
Thanks for explaining that Peter.
I took a look and found your
From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/26/2003 6:15 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Cc:
Subject: RE: Ant 1.6 local and macrodef attributes
Here is my proposal for you guys to vote on.
Two completely separate votes:
1) Vote on @{x} as the syntax fo
Here is my proposal for you guys to vote on.
Two completely separate votes:
1) Vote on @{x} as the syntax for textual substitutions
of attributes in .
Once this is settle, we can move on releasing
in B3 with its fixed syntax.
2) Vote on , must include decision on syntax,
scope (i.e., passing t
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 11:09, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a)
> > I sent a vote last week on local properties
> > and the result was:
> >committers others (+ votes in bugzilla)
> >have local in ant 1
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 10:31, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
> > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > b)
> > I send an vote the week before about local properties being
> > implemented by textual replacement or by using local
> > properties. The result was:
>
> The vote was ab
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a)
> I sent a vote last week on local properties
> and the result was:
>committers others (+ votes in bugzilla)
>have local in ant 1.6 2 1 + 6
>not 0 0
>
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> b)
> I send an vote the week before about local properties being
> implemented by textual replacement or by using local
> properties. The result was:
>
The vote was about macrodef expanding attributes as local properties.
Just to make things
a)
I sent a vote last week on local properties
and the result was:
committers others (+ votes in bugzilla)
have local in ant 1.6 2 1 + 6
not 0 0
+0 1 0
Based on this and other feedback I t
11 matches
Mail list logo
