On 11/8/10 9:49 AM, Jan Matèrne wrote:
>> I would assume that if dependencies between targets are properly set,
>> and if it happens that the target dependency graph have two separates
>> branch which are merging at some point, Ant would then be able to run
>> those two separates branches in differ
> I would assume that if dependencies between targets are properly set,
> and if it happens that the target dependency graph have two separates
> branch which are merging at some point, Ant would then be able to run
> those two separates branches in different threads, right ?
>
> I doubt there wou
Le 7 nov. 2010 à 07:28, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> On 2010-11-02, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>
>> - why do we not ship ant and ivy together ?
>
> To some people our current distributions are too big already 8-)
>
> There certainly is room for additional distribution formats like "the
> latest
On 2010-11-02, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> - why do we not ship ant and ivy together ?
To some people our current distributions are too big already 8-)
There certainly is room for additional distribution formats like "the
latest Ant bundled with the latest Ivy" that could be released whenever
> I got several interesting questions from participants :
I don't have the official answer ;-)
But my few cents:
> - why do we not ship ant and ivy together ?
Never really thought of. Maybe because its different release times.
But what Ant could do is bundling the latest Ivy ... (or did we have
Hi,
I have animated an improvised Ant+Ivy session at the Barcamp at
ApacheCon US in Atlanta.
I got several interesting questions from participants :
- why do we not ship ant and ivy together ?
- which support is there in ant to take advantage of multicore machines
to do work in parallel ?
