On Thursday 23 October 2003 15:16, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Wednesday 22 October 2003 08:41, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
> > > I am OK for the third beta.
> > > In the third beta we should have :
> > > - the properties,
> > > - a new xml
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 08:41, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
> > I am OK for the third beta.
> > In the third beta we should have :
> > - the properties,
> > - a new xml-apis.jar (probably the one which is distributed with
> > Xerces-Java 2.5)
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 08:41, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
> I am OK for the third beta.
> In the third beta we should have :
> - the properties,
> - a new xml-apis.jar (probably the one which is distributed with
> Xerces-Java 2.5)
> - can we also have the endorsed libraries ?
> - other point
-0 (don't object enough to veto it)
I would like to put the local property patch into ant 1.6.
Normally I would wait for 1.7 for this, but it has a big
and (I think) beneficial impact on .
The changes to macrodef are not Backward Compatible
with the current implementation.
The task declares prope
I am OK for the third beta.
In the third beta we should have :
- the properties,
- a new xml-apis.jar (probably the one which is distributed with Xerces-Java
2.5)
- can we also have the endorsed libraries ?
- other points ?
Once these changes are done - hopefully soon - we will set new dates (for
I am +1 on this.
The fact that some of the changes in the patches are not backward compatible
would be a problem for inclusion in ant 1.7
Cheers,
Antoine
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 17:36
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
