Re: AW: Ant 1.6 local and ThreadLocals

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I understand that there is a consensus to have macrodef use @{attribute} notation. Well of the committers, there were 2 (you + Stefan) votes for it, + me :-\ + jan via private e-mail. I am not afraid that we cannot get committers support for local, I am more a

AW: Ant 1.6 local and ThreadLocals

Hi, I understand that there is a consensus to have macrodef use @{attribute} notation. I am not afraid that we cannot get committers support for local, I am more afraid that in the course of introducing local, there will be more discussions concerning issues of scope, thread support, ..., which w

AW: Ant 1.6 local and macrodef attributes

Hi Peter, I have been quite silent recently because I am busy at work ... I am OK for the @{attributename} syntax for the textual substitution of attributes in macrodef. Cheers, Antoine -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember

AW: Ant 1.6

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. September 2003 12:42 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: Ant 1.6 >On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 04:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >> I remeber you've told me the same at least once in the past 8-) >>

AW: Ant 1.6

I would like to release ant 1.6 beta on tuesday next week (September 30th). Can you all have your changes ready by then ? Really what I would prefer is that all changes which should go into both 1.6 and HEAD get merged by the committer who does the change, so that I do not have to do it myself. I

AW: Ant 1.6

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 22. September 2003 16:41 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Ant 1.6 On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - sort out if possible the CLASSPATH issue by : >What y

AW: Ant 1.6

Will do. My question is more whether my idea makes sense on the principle. Antoine -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 22. September 2003 12:24 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: Ant 1.6 > - sort out if possible the CLASSPATH issu

AW: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

> I'd like to kick off a discussion on what needs to be done to > get Ant 1.6 to a release. New release +1 Ant 1.6 CVS version provides so many nice features that I vote for making a new release. In my opinion the official statement that JDK 1.2 is needed doesn´t mean that the whole tool has