Re: AW: AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread peter reilly
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 09:33, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: > Which of the 3 solutions you propose is the best in terms of preparing the > transition to 1.7 and roles ? The third. > > And the easiest to understand for users ? The first. (I think). The second for people that want to write xml syn

AW: AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Which of the 3 solutions you propose is the best in terms of preparing the transition to 1.7 and roles ? And the easiest to understand for users ? How can we formulate the rules in terms of when an xml prefix such as antcontrib: is required ? When is it optional ? On the details side, I did not