> > I think would make the buildscript to a
> > kind of
> > macro language. People (like me :) prefer to hack a
> > macrodef
> > prior to invest more time to implement a real task.
> >
> > And then you´ll need real "variables".
> >
>
> So are you saying you think s should only be
> used as "re
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > I cringe at the thought of the number of
> "unique
> > > > properties" that could be floating about
> resulting
> > > > from this...
>
> I think would make the buildscript to a
> kind of
> macro language. People (like me :) prefer to hack a
> macrodef
> prior
> > > I cringe at the thought of the number of "unique
> > > properties" that could be floating about resulting
> > > from this...
I think would make the buildscript to a kind of
macro language. People (like me :) prefer to hack a macrodef
prior to invest more time to implement a real task.
And
