> I thus don't think it's a useful addition, since all scenarios
> can be easily achieved right now, in the usual Ant way. --DD
Nothing to add by me.
Jan
> From: steve morin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 1st usage convenience..
> A person that often uses a different build file could use a shell
> script that calls ant using a different default for convenience.
>
> #!/bin/sh
> ant -df config.xml "$@"
>
> or
> alias cfg="ant -df c
Also forgot to mention that this could also be set in ANT_ARGS if one wanted
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:58:54 -0400, steve morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan and Peter to answer your questions I have a couple of scenarios
> where this could be useful.
>
> 1st usage convenience..
> A person that
Jan and Peter to answer your questions I have a couple of scenarios
where this could be useful.
1st usage convenience..
A person that often uses a different build file could use a shell
script that calls ant using a different default for convenience.
#!/bin/sh
ant -df conf
Why doing that?
ant -f other.xml
would work.
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am: Montag, 11. Oktober 2004 10:50
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] set filename of default buildfile
>
> The patch did not get tru the
