AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-30 Thread Jan . Materne
Maybe someone can make a statistic for the dev and user mailinglist. But the toplevel domain of the email adresses wouldn´t say too much. Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 30. April 2003 08:31 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-30 Thread Jan . Materne
t; > If you want fame in the developer community, why not take up > speaking at > conferences. It's a lot easier and more fun. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 22:

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-30 Thread Jan . Materne
It seems so. In the past two years I read a lot of articles about Ant in several newspapers (iX - www.heise.de/iX, Java Magazin - www.javamagazin.de, Java Spektrum - www.javaspektrum.de, ...) I thought about writing a book for my own, and the publisher liked that idea to have a book about that top

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Jan . Materne
"Medium" reference? I compare that to Eriks and Steves book ... so most of them are "short" :-) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Montag, 28. April 2003 10:51 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] New resource found >

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Jan . Materne
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Montag, 28. April 2003 10:36 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] New resource found > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While creating the diff for resou

AW: [PATCH] New resource found

2003-04-28 Thread Jan . Materne
Fine, it seems that my attachement didn´t come through ... So as inline: diff-file --8-<-8-<-8-<-8-<-8-<-8-<-8- <-8-<--- --- C:\seu\cvs-downloads\ant\ant\xdocs\resources.xml.org.fixcrlfMon Apr 28 06:08:46 2003 +++ C:\seu\cvs-downl