release of Ant 1.8.0RC1.
The artifacts have just been uploaded and should be available soon.
Regards,
Antoine
just tried several mirrors, but the link to release notes on
http://ant.apache.org/bindownload.cgi
/*
Currently, Apache Ant 1.8.0RC1 is the best available version, see the
release
Am 12.01.2010 19:14, schrieb Antoine Levy Lambert:
> Hi,
>
> I have the pleasure to announce the release of Ant 1.8.0RC1.
> The artifacts have just been uploaded and should be available soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
just tried several mirrors, but the link
Hi,
I have the pleasure to announce the release of Ant 1.8.0RC1.
The artifacts have just been uploaded and should be available soon.
Regards,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
Hi,
we have 8 +1 for the ant 1.8.0RC1 release. So I am going to proceed with
uploading the artefacts to the web site.
Regards,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:00:53 -0500, Antoine Levy Lambert
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just done a build of ant 1.8.0RC1. The tag in svn is ANT_180_RC1.
>
> The build can be downloaded from
> http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0RC1/ for
evaluation.
>
> Th
Hi,
Tested in windows7+JDK7, works fine for me, and with my Anton or Onant
extension.
--
Cheers,
Qinxian
2010/1/11 Kevin Jackson :
> Hi,
>
> [+1] release this build as ant 1.8.0RC1
>
> I've only tested on Ubuntu 9.10 x64 + java6, but it looks ok to me
> (hope to do Windo
+1 for 1.8.0RC1
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Gilles Scokart [mailto:gscok...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 11. Januar 2010 09:29
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] release ant 1.8.0RC1
>
> > Vote
> >
> > [+1] release this
Hi,
[+1] release this build as ant 1.8.0RC1
I've only tested on Ubuntu 9.10 x64 + java6, but it looks ok to me
(hope to do Windows7 test when the RC is available)
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apach
> Vote
>
> [+1] release this build as ant 1.8.0RC1
> [ ] do not release this build
>
>
Gilles Scokart
I have done these changes.
Regards,
Antoine
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hello Martijn,
your questions are right. It looks like the ant-apache-xalan2.jar is
either new or reinstated in 1.8.0 and no POM has been added.
Similarily, the ant-stylebook POM should have been removed. Also the
ant-
Hello Martijn,
your questions are right. It looks like the ant-apache-xalan2.jar is
either new or reinstated in 1.8.0 and no POM has been added.
Similarily, the ant-stylebook POM should have been removed. Also the
ant-parent POM needs to be corrected.
I think ant-parent is just a placeholder
Kevin Jackson wrote:
So to bootstrap/build ant from src now I no longer need the weblogic
and starteam jars?
Kev
Hello Kev,
that's perfectly right, weblogic and starteam jars are not needed any
more to bootstrap/build ant.
Regards,
Antoine
--
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> Ant 1.8.0RC1 is not dependent upon weblogic. The only commercial dependency
> left is NetRex.
>
> I read somewhere that we removed the dependencies of ant proper upon
> weblogic and starteam, and I removed the co
:
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
[X] release this build as ant 1.8.0RC1
[ ] do not release this build
I have played with it for a while in the context of NetBeans (building
all IDE sources, and using various Ant-based project types inside the
IDE), and have not found any regressions so far. Checked on
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
[X] release this build as ant 1.8.0RC1
[ ] do not release this build
I have played with it for a while in the context of NetBeans (building all IDE sources, and using various Ant-based project types inside the IDE), and have not found any
regressions so far
Thanks,
Antoine
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-01-07, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I do not know as I did not write componentdef. It is mysterious for me
how componentdef works, because I have seen that the Definer class has
a setRestrict method which sets a boolean restrict, but I did not
Ant 1.8.0RC1 is not dependent upon weblogic. The only commercial
dependency left is NetRex.
I read somewhere that we removed the dependencies of ant proper upon
weblogic and starteam, and I removed the corresponding ant-weblogic and
ant-starteam POMS.
Regards,
Antoine
Stefan Bodewig wrote
On 2010-01-07, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> I do not know as I did not write componentdef. It is mysterious for me
> how componentdef works, because I have seen that the Definer class has
> a setRestrict method which sets a boolean restrict, but I did not see
> where this boolean is read ?
It i
On 2010-01-07, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> Just minor nits in the release notes, nothing important enough to hold
> anything up:
> 1. On the line describing , we have:
>This method is now used to define conditions, selectors and selectors.
> Was the second selectors meant to be filtersets?
pr
On 2010-01-07, Kevin Jackson wrote:
> I get a few Class Cast errors for example:
> XMLFragmentTest testNestedText Error
> weblogic.apache.xerces.parsers.SecurityConfiguration
> cannot be cast to
> weblogic.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration
One of the weblogic jars contai
I had problems to find the tool to generate these release notes. I
used to use another web site "txt2html" which did not work for me this
time. Let me see if I can remove some empty lines.
Antoine
I will not have time today to remove the empty lines, and I need to find
a better tool. Anyon
Maarten Coene wrote:
One remark: maybe it's related to my browser, but
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0RC1/RELEASE-NOTES-1.8.0RC1.html
doesn't look very nice and is very annoying to read with all these new/empty
lines...
I had problems to find the tool t
Bruce Atherton wrote:
Just minor nits in the release notes, nothing important enough to hold
anything up:
1. On the line describing , we have:
This method is now used to define conditions, selectors and selectors.
Was the second selectors meant to be filtersets?
I do not know as I did not
I only did some functional testing, and everything still worked fine :-)
So +1 from me.
One remark: maybe it's related to my browser, but
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0RC1/RELEASE-NOTES-1.8.0RC1.html
doesn't look very nice and is very annoying to read with all
site ?
Antoine
Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi
I hope to test the code tonight on Ubuntu 9.10 + Windows7 ultimate
(VirtualBox version)
However I note a temporal anomaly on the website:
"January 12, 2010 - Ant 1.8.0RC1 Available"
Tempus fugit inde
Hi,
Sorry I didn't include a full stacktrace:
SymlinkTest testDelete
weblogic.apache.xerces.parsers.SecurityConfiguration cannot be cast to
weblogic.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration
java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.apache.xerces.parsers.SecurityConfiguration cannot be ca
Hi,
I've taken the tagged 1.8RC1 from svn and built against the jars I
used for 1.7.1
I get a few Class Cast errors for example:
XMLFragmentTest testNestedText Error
weblogic.apache.xerces.parsers.SecurityConfiguration
cannot be cast to
weblogic.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration
evy Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I have just done a build of ant 1.8.0RC1. The tag in svn is ANT_180_RC1.
The build can be downloaded from
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0RC1/ for
evaluation.
The tentative release date for this build is January 12 th 2010.
Vote
[ ] release this bu
Hi
I hope to test the code tonight on Ubuntu 9.10 + Windows7 ultimate
(VirtualBox version)
However I note a temporal anomaly on the website:
"January 12, 2010 - Ant 1.8.0RC1 Available"
Tempus fugit indeed...
Kev
--
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-01-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-01-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I'll run the testsute against the binary distribution you've created
later today.
OK, didn't manage to do it yesterday, did it earlier this morning.
Running the tests against
On 2010-01-06, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> I have just done a build of ant 1.8.0RC1. The tag in svn is ANT_180_RC1.
> The build can be downloaded from
> http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0RC1/ for
> evaluation.
RAT found two files that I've fixed in
On 2010-01-06, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2010-01-06, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>>>[junit] Testcase:
>>> testSymbolicLinkUtilsMethods(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix.SymlinkTest):
>>> FAILED
>> I've never seen that, which OS?
> Mac OS 10.5.8
On 2010-01-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-01-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I'll run the testsute against the binary distribution you've created
> later today.
OK, didn't manage to do it yesterday, did it earlier this morning.
Running the tests against the jars of the binary distribution (by
On 2010-01-06, wrote:
> Downloaded the src-distro, extracted with Winzip.
> Classpath not set.
> Path=C:\Programme\Perl\bin\;C:\WINNT\system32;C:\WINNT;C:\WINNT\System32
> \Wbem;c:\bin
> PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH;.pl
> Java:
> Java-Home: c:\jdk\142_15
> java versio
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-01-06, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
[junit] Testcase:
testSymbolicLinkUtilsMethods(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix.SymlinkTest):
FAILED
I've never seen that, which OS?
Mac OS 10.5.8
[au:antunit] Target: testTraceJdk15+ FAILED
Hello Jan,
this would make sense.
Regards,
Antoine
jan.mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
I think it is a known issue that JDK 1.4 isn't able to create Ant's
javadocs. I've never bothered to see what exactly triggers
the failure.
If it is a "known error" - should I skip the javadocs if no
>I think it is a known issue that JDK 1.4 isn't able to create Ant's
>javadocs. I've never bothered to see what exactly triggers
>the failure.
If it is a "known error" - should I skip the javadocs if not Java5+?
Jan
-
To unsub
On 2010-01-06, wrote:
> Placed junit-3.7.jar in lib/optional and retry
> build:
> Created dir:
> C:\Downloads\apache-ant-1.8.0RC1-src\apache-ant-1.8.0RC1\build\lib
> Compiling 250 source files to
> C:\Downloads\apache-ant-1.8.0RC1-src\apache-ant-1.8.0RC1\build\classes
> C:
On 2010-01-06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-01-06, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>> About AntClassLoader5Test, I do not know whether this has to do with
>> that, but I did the build in the following way :
>> - first pass building everything with JDK 1.4. Then build with JDK
>> 1.5. It looks l
Downloaded the src-distro, extracted with Winzip.
Classpath not set.
Path=C:\Programme\Perl\bin\;C:\WINNT\system32;C:\WINNT;C:\WINNT\System32
\Wbem;c:\bin
PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH;.pl
Java:
Java-Home: c:\jdk\142_15
java version "1.4.2_15"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environm
On 2010-01-06, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>[junit] Testcase:
> testSymbolicLinkUtilsMethods(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.unix.SymlinkTest):
> FAILED
I've never seen that, which OS?
> [au:antunit] Target: testTraceJdk15+ FAILED
Which build file is that?
> I know that the junit
Hi,
I found 5 failing test cases in the build of ant 1.8.0RC1.
[junit] Testcase:
testGetResourcesUsingFactory(org.apache.tools.ant.loader.AntClassLoader5Test):
FAILED
[junit] Test org.apache.tools.ant.loader.AntClassLoader5Test FAILED
[junit] Testcase:
testRedirector13
Hi,
I have just done a build of ant 1.8.0RC1. The tag in svn is ANT_180_RC1.
The build can be downloaded from
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/apache-ant-1.8.0RC1/ for evaluation.
The tentative release date for this build is January 12 th 2010.
Vote
[ ] release this build as ant
43 matches
Mail list logo
