Re: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Dominique Devienne wrote: Ullrich was kind enough to provide me data gathered by my own performance listener, which shows timings for tasks as well as targets: Timing by tasks in Ant 1.6.2:in Ant 1.6.5 --- -- -- -- --- -- 19.578,0 ms 175,2%24x ant

RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Ullrich was kind enough to provide me data gathered by my own performance listener, which shows timings for tasks as well as targets: Timing by tasks in Ant 1.6.2:in Ant 1.6.5 --- -- -- -- --- -- 19.578,0 ms 175,2%24x antcall62.235,0 ms 189,0% 5

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35060] - ant 1.6.4 does not seem to use ~/.ant/lib anymore

NVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-27 17:41 --- Jpackage has not released ant 1.6.3 or 1.6.4 yet. I do not know if there is an issue with their packaging of ant 1.6.4, but there has been no such bug reports (yet). If you want to use ant 1.6.4, you will need to u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35060] - ant 1.6.4 does not seem to use ~/.ant/lib anymore

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35060 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-27 16:07 --- (In reply to comment #1) > can you please give a small self contained example. > My testing with ant 1.6.4 does no show this problem After further investigation the problem seems to lie

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35060] - ant 1.6.4 does not seem to use ~/.ant/lib anymore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35060] - ant 1.6.4 does not seem to use ~/.ant/lib anymore

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35060 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 18:53 --- can you please give a small self contained example. My testing with ant 1.6.4 does no show this problem -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Y

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35060] New: - ant 1.6.4 does not seem to use ~/.ant/lib anymore

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35060 Summary: ant 1.6.4 does not seem to use ~/.ant/lib anymore Product: Ant Version: 1.6.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

Re: 1.6.4

The email announcing the ant 1.6.4 release is already sent. > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: Re: 1.6.4 > Datum: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:21:39 -0700 (PDT) > > I noticed

Ant 1.6.4 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have the pleasure to annouce the release of Ant 1.6.4. This is a bug fix release, including fixing of a bug affecting javah and another affecting directory scanning activities. In one or two hours, the release will be visible on our web site

Ant 1.6.4 build starting

Hello, I am going in a few minutes to start the build of Ant 1.6.4. If things go well, the release will be uploaded at or before 4pm CET. Cheers, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] include FTP task revisions in 1.6.4 release

Steve Cohen wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Shall the newly added FTP task revisions be incorporated into release 1.6.4? I'm withdrawing this vote request. Although commons-net functions as expected, the relationship with the FTP task is a little more complicated than I'd thought, and those

Re: [VOTE] include FTP task revisions in 1.6.4 release

Steve Cohen wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Shall the newly added FTP task revisions be incorporated into release 1.6.4? Motivation: I understand this comes in "under the wire" and may cause justifiable trepidation among some. I still favor adding it to the release

Re: [VOTE] include FTP task revisions in 1.6.4 release

Steve Cohen wrote: Shall the newly added FTP task revisions be incorporated into release 1.6.4? I'm withdrawing this vote request. Although commons-net functions as expected, the relationship with the FTP task is a little more complicated than I'd thought, and those who have expre

Re: [VOTE] include FTP task revisions in 1.6.4 release

Steve Loughran wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Shall the newly added FTP task revisions be incorporated into release 1.6.4? Motivation: I understand this comes in "under the wire" and may cause justifiable trepidation among some. I still favor adding it to the release because: 1) The task

Re: [VOTE] include FTP task revisions in 1.6.4 release

Steve Cohen wrote: Shall the newly added FTP task revisions be incorporated into release 1.6.4? Motivation: I understand this comes in "under the wire" and may cause justifiable trepidation among some. I still favor adding it to the release because: 1) The tasks add some imp

[VOTE] include FTP task revisions in 1.6.4 release

Shall the newly added FTP task revisions be incorporated into release 1.6.4? Motivation: I understand this comes in "under the wire" and may cause justifiable trepidation among some. I still favor adding it to the release because: 1) The tasks add some important new capabilities (i

[VOTE] include FTP task revisions in 1.6.4 release

Shall the newly added FTP task revisions be incorporated into release 1.6.4? Motivation: I understand this comes in "under the wire" and may cause justifiable trepidation among some. I still favor adding it to the release because: 1) The tasks add some important new capabilities (i

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) +1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

+1 - Alexey. On 5/9/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th > (this would at least suit Eclipse) > > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > > Cheers, > > Antoine > >

Re: Company Disclaimer [WAS: RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release]

t; > > -Original Message- > > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:44 AM > > To: Ant Developers List > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release > > > > ... > > --DD > >

Company Disclaimer [WAS: RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release]

of a PITA. Any suggestion for this Outlook/Exchange user? Are web-based client really usable? --DD > -Original Message- > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:44 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.

RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

> From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th > (this would at least suit Eclipse) > > [+1] Yes > [ ] No --DD -- This e-mail, including an

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

On Tue, 10 May 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mai

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

On May 10, 2005, at 2:48 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [X] Yes [ ] No +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

RE: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

+1 Jose > -Original Message- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 May 2005 10:42 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release > > > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursda

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [+1 ] Yes [ ] No steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [ +1] Yes [ ] No steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [ ] Yes [ ] No Cheers, Antoine Yes, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [ ] Yes [ ] No +1 Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [ ] Yes [ ] No Cheers, Antoine +1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

[x] Yes [ ] No and +1 just in case ;) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

+1 Jan - would be a birthday present for my girl friend :-) > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 08:49 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release > > Do we want to

[VOTE] Ant 1.6.4 release

Do we want to release ant 1.6.4 on Thursday, May 19th (this would at least suit Eclipse) [ ] Yes [ ] No Cheers, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]