Re: and case

Steve Loughran wrote: It looks like the case of the extension of the task is that of the algorithm used, even though that is case insensitive MD5 -> .MD5 SHA -> .SHA md5 -> .md5 sha -> .sha "" -> .MD5 I am not convinced this is the right thing to do. It'd be easy to use checksum to have code

Re: and case

On Wed, 18 May 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not convinced this is the right thing to do. Neither am I in retrospect, but I'm afraid it is too late. > It'd be easy to use checksum to have code that worked on windows, > but not unix. Shouldnt we go > extension="."+algorit

and case

It looks like the case of the extension of the task is that of the algorithm used, even though that is case insensitive MD5 -> .MD5 SHA -> .SHA md5 -> .md5 sha -> .sha "" -> .MD5 I am not convinced this is the right thing to do. It'd be easy to use checksum to have code that worked on windows,