--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> first and last seem fine to me (:-)
In which case, no name change and would be a
convenience addition post 1.7.0. I guess that works.
-Matt
> Peter
>
>
> On 12/12/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTE
first and last seem fine to me (:-)
Peter
On 12/12/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > with first & last, we should also consider
> renaming to
> > "head" & "tail" as suggested by (IIRC) Jan or
> Antoine.
>
> I'd prefer a "head" & "tail"
--- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > with first & last, we should also consider
> renaming to
> > "head" & "tail" as suggested by (IIRC) Jan or
> Antoine.
>
> I'd prefer a "head" & "tail" naming style too, it
> matches functional
> list programming style, but your the main dev on
with first & last, we should also consider renaming to
"head" & "tail" as suggested by (IIRC) Jan or Antoine.
I'd prefer a "head" & "tail" naming style too, it matches functional
list programming style, but your the main dev on this stuff it's up
to you :)
I just saw an opportunity to ch
--- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you need to get the first X elements, presumably
> there will be
> occasions where you'll need to get the last X
> elements. Anyway, I've
> been playing with Haskell recently and it's affected
> my thinking :)
Hi Kev,
I've been (mostly) away for
If you need to get the first X elements, presumably there will be
occasions where you'll need to get the last X elements. Anyway, I've
been playing with Haskell recently and it's affected my thinking :)
Kev
Index:
D:/java_projects/ant-core-trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/L
