> Do you agree that we should do it ?
>
> [ ] Yes
>
> [ ] No
>
> Let me start with my +1
>
+1
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think I already reacted:
> Do you agree that we should do it ?
>
> [+1] Yes
>
> [ ] No
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[+1] Yes
Peter
On 4/28/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Do you agree that we should do it ?
>
> [+1] Yes
>
> [ ] No
-Matt
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Do you agree that we should do it ?
>
> [+1] Yes
>
> [ ] No
-Matt
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I assume that there are no extensions (by API programmers) of the
Metamata and of the Sitraka JProbe tasks.
To the contrary, it is possible that there are API users who use for
instance the Project#resolveFile() methods.
Hmm, it would be nice if we actually publis
On 4/26/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The cleanup means concretely removing:
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata
packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases.
+1. --DD
--
+1
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Stephane Bailliez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. April 2006 11:43
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
>
>Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>> The 3 p
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
The 3 people who answered were all in favor of this cleanup. I thought
that it might be better to start a vote thread on this one too.
The cleanup means concretely removing the
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka and
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Stephane Bailliez wrote:
Hi all,
As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup
going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of:
- JProbe Coverage task
- Metamata Audit task
- Metamata Metrics task
JProbe should not be working a
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Kev Jackson wrote:
Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove
deprecated classes? Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp? If so
does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp?
Kev
I assume that there are n
Kev Jackson wrote:
>
>
>>
> Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove
> deprecated classes? Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp? If so
> does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp?
>
> Kev
>
I assume that there are no extensions (by API programm
Do you agree that we should do it ?
[ X ] Yes
+1
[ ] No
Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove
deprecated classes? Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp? If so
does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp?
Kev
-
Stephane Bailliez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup
> going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of:
> - JProbe Coverage task
> - Metamata Audit task
> - Metamata Metrics task
>
> JProbe should not be working anymore since JPr
13 matches
Mail list logo
