Re: includeantruntime warning (was: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1)

Just did not like the presence of the warning,since it will hit nearly every ant build file out there. Still it is in ant 1.8.0 so no need to change it now. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: >> >> I am not too sure that I like the warning: >> >> 'inc

Re: includeantruntime warning (was: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1)

Peter Reilly wrote: I am not too sure that I like the warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds You don't like the text of the warning message, or the fact that there is a warning at all? I have just seen a lot of bui

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

ok, scratch that, the warning happens for ant 1.8.0 as well :-( So +1 for the 1.8.1 release. Peter On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: > I am not too sure that I like the warning: > > /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning: > 'includeantruntime' was not set, defa

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

I am not too sure that I like the warning: /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds when using without setting the includeantruntime attribute. (not too sure if this was added

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

+1 no issue here with easyant Regards, 2010/5/1 Antoine Levy-Lambert > Hi, > > I have uploaded a candidate for ant 1.8.1 under > http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ > > Also a label ANT_181 has been created in the repository. > > Vote to release th

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

On 4-5-2010 14:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1 [X] Yes [ ] No +1 martijn No problems observed - To unsubscribe

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

Maarten Coene wrote: I did had one minor regression when running the Ivy junit tests where the test summary is printed twice I think I have seen the topmost stack trace element before the failure duplicated, but not sure. -

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,858 sec I don't think this should block the release though, so here is my vote: +1 Maarten - Original Message From: Antoine Levy-Lambert To: Ant Developers List Sent: Sat, May 1, 2010 6:41:46 AM Subject: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1 Hi, I have uploa

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

+1 I see no issues here with the fairly complex build I manage. On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > > Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1 > > > [X] Yes > > > [ ] No > > +1 > > Stefan > >

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1 > [X] Yes > [ ] No +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apach

Re: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1 [X] Yes Have not found any issues with it yet. Plan to bundle it in NetBeans IDE 6.9. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For addition

[VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1

Hi, I have uploaded a candidate for ant 1.8.1 under http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ Also a label ANT_181 has been created in the repository. Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1 [ ] Yes [ ] No Regards, Antoine