Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The one interesting issue is that as Java1.5 beta has just shipped, we should test against that to see if there are any surprises that we can fix in 1.6.1. ;-)

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had to remove the target=${javac.target} from the two javac tasks > in ant's build.xml. Alternatively you can add source="1.3" to get rid of the warning message IIRC. > One test failed: > [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Peter Reilly wrote: It looks like this is a bug with javac compiler. I get the same problem from the command line: >javac -target 1.1 -sourcepath src -d classes src/*.java javac: source release 1.4 requires target release 1.4 Opps, I just realized that Stefan had already said that (with the work-ar

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Peter Reilly wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 06 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just don't want to adapt anything here before I see the docs for JDK 1.5 as it is hard to tell what has been changed intentionally and what is a bug in the JDK. All that I've written in

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 06 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just don't want to adapt anything here before I see the docs for JDK 1.5 as it is hard to tell what has been changed intentionally and what is a bug in the JDK. All that I've written in my last post appli

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just don't want to adapt anything here before I see the docs for > JDK 1.5 as it is hard to tell what has been changed intentionally > and what is a bug in the JDK. All that I've written in my last post applied to the 1.5alpha rel

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The one interesting issue is that as Java1.5 beta has just shipped, > we should test against that to see if there are any surprises that > we can fix in 1.6.1. ;-)

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the NOTICE. I plan to do this this evening. Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as proposed previously ? Or do we need to

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've one more tiny modification I'd like to do I forgot the ant shell script modifications for jpackage. I have a new patch by Randy Watler that looks promising, I just need to test and integrate it, hope

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've one more tiny modification I'd like to do I forgot the ant shell script modifications for jpackage. I have a new patch by Randy Watler that looks promising, I just need to test and integrate it, hope I'll do so by tomorrow as

RE: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

> Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : > put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + > checkin the NOTICE. > I plan to do this this evening. > > Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as > proposed previously ? > > Or do we need to wait more

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the > 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the > NOTICE. I've one more tiny modification I'd like to do - make behave more nicely in a non GU

Re: [VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the NOTICE. I plan to do this this evening. Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as proposed previously ? Yes Or do we need

[VOTE] date for 1.6.1 final

Concerning 1.6.1, the only work I have leftover to do is : put the 2.0 license in 24 scripts, xsl or txt documents + checkin the NOTICE. I plan to do this this evening. Do we want to release 1.6.1 final on Thursday, Feb 12th as proposed previously ? Or do we need to wait more ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Ant