A couple of issues have been raised with the current RC1 release that is
being voted upon:
- Extra files in the source archive which weren't present in previous
versions
- Mismatch in the version numbers of BCEL and commons-net dependencies
between the libraries.properties and the pom.xml fi
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 15:48, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Please not that the ASF nor its projects release Binaries.
> (They are provided to users as a convenience)
> We also do not vote on releases based on Binaries.
>
> The vote should be based on whether or not the 'source' - that
> is being rele
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 16:27, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
> On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> > If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17,
>
> This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix
> release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This releas
On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17,
This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix
release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This release changes
nothing on that front. One of the bug fixes in
Hello Paul,
On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote:
I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional.
I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine.
Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous
releases and they too contain the binary jars in the s
If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17, shouldn't unit tests
for script-related tasks in Ant core be complemented with an assumption
that Rhino, Nashorn or Graal JS is around?
Gintas
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 10:58, Paul King wrote:
> +0 (non-binding)
>
> I checked:
> * LICENSE & NO
+0 (non-binding)
I checked:
* LICENSE & NOTICE seem okay
* HASH & SIG seem okay
* I ran against the Groovy test suite which has 100+ ant-related tests and
all continue to pass (using JDK16 and the upcoming Groovy 4)
I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional.
I don'
+1
Maarten
Op donderdag 30 september 2021 04:58:56 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.12:
git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC1
on commit: cb7f242aa099c069bd75e6ee4d6e50b56fd73b71
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 5
I'll need one more PMC member's vote on this for me to move forward.
Anyone have some time this week to test this?
-Jaikiran
On 03/10/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
noted in
https://dist.
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
> noted in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.12.html. Of
> particular interest is the relatively minor bug fix in the javadoc
> task which is necessary for it to wo
Hi.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 2:28 PM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> +1
>
> - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
>
Please not that the ASF nor its projects release Binaries.
(They are provided to users as a convenience)
We also do not vote on releases based on Binaries.
The vote should be based on whether or n
+1
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
- Checked the NOTICE file and some random manuals
- Built internal projects using Java 8 and this version of Ant
- Built some sample projects with Java 17 and this version Ant
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 30/09/21 8:28 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've created
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.12:
git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC1
on commit: cb7f242aa099c069bd75e6ee4d6e50b56fd73b71
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 50166
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1051
13 matches
Mail list logo
