Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> Shall the .NET antlib be promoted?
>
> [X] Yes (i.e. +1)
> [ ] and I want to become a committer to it
> [ ] No
>
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shall the .NET antlib be promoted?
>
> [X ] Yes (i.e. +1)
> [ ] and I want to become a committer to it
> [ ] No
>
-Matt
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.
Shall the .NET antlib be promoted?
[ ] Yes (i.e. +1)
[ ] and I want to become a committer to it
[ ] No
Blank vote from Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an
antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib.
Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7).
Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC
me
In accordance with section 4.6 of the antlibs subproject charter, an
antlib needs a PMC majority to be accepted as a "proper" antlib.
Majority means at least 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s (section 4.7).
Each Antlib also needs at least three committers with at least one PMC
member among them. If you
