AW: AW: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-12 Thread Jan.Materne
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Did I understood something wrong? >> I thought we had voted to drop Win98 >> > >I'm happy if we drop it completely. > >Conor That was the vote. Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AW: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-12 Thread Conor MacNeill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Did I understood something wrong? > I thought we had voted to drop Win98 > I'm happy if we drop it completely. Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

AW: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Jan.Materne
Did I understood something wrong? I thought we had voted to drop Win98 Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 02:36 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Conor MacNeill
> > The issue I would see is that by having a win98 batch file we are > implicitly saying win98 is supported. I'd rather just see us treat it > the same way MS does :-) > > Conor > Just for the record: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/support/endofsupport.mspx Conor -

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Conor MacNeill
Steve Loughran wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: >> +1 for ant98 plan. >> >> Peter >> > > One of the issues here is not just the .bat file, but > > -the implicit assumption that all windows platforms are on filesystem > with a granularity of 2s, that is, FAT32. We need to assume that > everything fro

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Steve Loughran
ECTED]> wrote: Hi, I think like Dominique. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500 Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 > +0 to removing support

Re: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Peter Reilly
t; Original-Nachricht > Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500 > Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 > > > +0 to removing support for Windows98 to ant.bat. > > >

Re: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Peter Reilly
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 > +0 to removing support for Windows98 to ant.bat. > > +1 to move ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making changes (and > simply) ant.bat so that it becomes Windows98 incompatible (Alexey's > suggestion). > > --DD > > On

Result of Vote: Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-07-11 Thread Jan.Materne
We startet a VOTE on 2006-06-27 about dropping Win98 support [1]. We had Conor +1 Steve +1 Jan +1 Alexey +0 Matt+0 Stefan +1 Martijn +1 Kev +1 DD +0 - better rename to ant98.bat and keep it Bruce +1 Antoine +0 - same as DD which means +1 7 +0 4 -0 0 -1

Re: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I think like Dominique. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500 Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 > +0 to removing support for Windows98 t

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-29 Thread Bruce Atherton
+1. Conor MacNeill wrote: Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. The benefit will be to allow us to improve the Ant launch batch file as well as not having to test or support Win98, which we don't really

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-29 Thread Dominique Devienne
+0 to removing support for Windows98 to ant.bat. +1 to move ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making changes (and simply) ant.bat so that it becomes Windows98 incompatible (Alexey's suggestion). --DD On 6/28/06, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now I know why I did not undertand how

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-28 Thread Kev Jackson
On 27 Jun 2006, at 21:33, Conor MacNeill wrote: Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. The benefit will be to allow us to improve the Ant launch batch file as well as not having to test or support W

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-28 Thread Martijn Kruithof
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. +1 Martijn (drop OS/2 support along the way as well?) ---

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, > I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-28 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
Now I know why I did not undertand how it worked... Maybe we should rename the current ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making incompatible changes in main ant.bat? - Alexey. On 6/28/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Conor MacNeill wrote: > ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifi

AW: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-28 Thread Jan.Materne
>Conor MacNeill wrote: >> ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern >platform, I'll >> refrain from passing judgement :-) >> > >leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely? I havent seen an OS/2 for a very long time... but I heard that my bank is using that. And maybe others,

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-28 Thread Steve Loughran
Conor MacNeill wrote: ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern platform, I'll refrain from passing judgement :-) leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-27 Thread Conor MacNeill
rsprüngliche Nachricht- >> >Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2006 16:33 >> >An: Ant Developers List >> >Betreff: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 >> > >> >Considering that we are getting into t

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-27 Thread Matt Benson
aintainance. > > And we would answer questions as long as we > can ;-) > > > > Jan > > > > >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > >Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2006 16:33 > > >An: Ant Developers L

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-27 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
answer questions as long as we can ;-) Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2006 16:33 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 > >Considering that we are getting in

AW: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-27 Thread Jan.Materne
velopers List >Betreff: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 > >Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing >Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in >Ant 1.7. The benefit will be to allow us to improve the Ant >launch batch file as well

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-27 Thread Steve Loughran
Conor MacNeill wrote: Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. The benefit will be to allow us to improve the Ant launch batch file as well as not having to test or support Win98, which we don't really supp

[VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

2006-06-27 Thread Conor MacNeill
Considering that we are getting into the swing of releasing Ant 1.7, I would like to suggest that we drop Win98 support in Ant 1.7. The benefit will be to allow us to improve the Ant launch batch file as well as not having to test or support Win98, which we don't really support well now anyway. he