Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
>
>>> Class.forName will use the system classloader and not the nice
>>> little
>>
>> IMHO This contradicts my experience of CLs, i think some p
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
>> Class.forName will use the system classloader and not the nice
>> little
>
> IMHO This contradicts my experience of CLs, i think some places
> inside tomcat used Class
- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:33
Subject: Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, I
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Which also implies that we'll need to go through Ant's codebase and
>>> replace all Class.forName() calls (we better do that anyway 8-).
>>
>> I didnt understand this, why?
>
> Class.forName will use
"Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The problem seems to be that we need a way to pass a CLASSPATH
> but without using the env variable. And this needs to have the
> override properties of the CLASSPATH that are used in gump.
>
Well, the problem i
I stand corrected, and apologize. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Haley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:53 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations
Dominique Devienne writes:
> Stefan is *of cou
Dominique Devienne writes:
> Stefan is *of course* right! Class.forName always uses the system class
> loader, and not some current loader.
No it doesn't. It uses the defining class loader of the caller.
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/docs/api/java/lang/Class.html#forName(java.lang.String)
And
pass null for it, that is. Stefan was referring the first form, that takes
only a class name. --DD
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length l
"Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Which also implies that we'll need to go through Ant's codebase and
> >> replace all Class.forName() calls (we better do that anyway 8-).
> >
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Which also implies that we'll need to go through Ant's codebase and
>> replace all Class.forName() calls (we better do that anyway 8-).
>
> I didnt understand this, why?
Class.forName will use the system classloader and not the
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations
"Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
"Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > what i've tried is to create a properties file from gump instead of
> > passing the classpath in the command line, make a Launcher class
> > th
EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations
I've solved that problem for my own purposes a few months ago, by just
hacking a bit at java.c, so it can read it's command line arguments from a
file, using the usual @file syntax (that Javac already sup
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:38 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations
Hola a todos:
I'm trying to solve w2k command line length problems for gump.
what i've tried is to create a properties file from gump
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what i've tried is to create a properties file from gump instead of
> passing the classpath in the command line, make a Launcher class
> that loads it in a URLclassloader and start ant's main,
Which also implies that we'll need to
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 10:00
Subject: Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations
> The problem seems to be that we need a way to pass a CLASSPATH
> but without using the env variable. And this needs to have the
>
The problem seems to be that we need a way to pass a CLASSPATH
but without using the env variable. And this needs to have the
override properties of the CLASSPATH that are used in gump.
Wouldn't be simpler to just add a bit of code to set java.class.path
from a file or property ? If you go with a
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 08:37
Subject: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations
> Hola a todos:
>
> I'm trying to solve w2k command l
Hola a todos:
I'm trying to solve w2k command line length problems for gump.
what i've tried is to create a properties file from gump instead of
passing the classpath in the command line, make a Launcher class that
loads it in a URLclassloader and start ant's main, this approach by
itself doesnt
19 matches
Mail list logo
