> > So, most of opensource java software create javadoc document with
> > javadoc task. This means I can't put such a package into main
> > section beacuse javadoc depend on SUN's implentation which is not
> > oss.
>
> Strictly speaking, you can build the package but you can't build the
> docs.
I
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian have 'main' and 'contrib' section. 'main' group is official
> debian package which mean it's compiled and run opensource
> platform(e.g. kaffe/gcj) 'contrib' group is non-official which mean
> it's opensource but can't be bui
Hi Stefan,
From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc
Date: 26 Sep 2003 11:40:12 +0200
> > In the past, I refactored rmic for other than SUN's rmic
> > implementation.
>
> Yes, I remember that.
Sorry, I meant to respond to this a lot earlier.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Current javadoc task support only SUN's javadoc. However there are
> another javadoc engine like gjdoc which is GNU's javadoc altenative.
How similar/different are javadoc and gjdoc
Hi ant,
Current javadoc task support only SUN's javadoc. However there are
another javadoc engine like gjdoc which is GNU's javadoc altenative.
If ant supports gjdoc, it would be helpful for diffusion of gjdoc.
In the past, I refactored rmic for other than SUN's rmic
implementation. This is seco
