On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (4) identify the initial set of committers
>>
>> All current Ant PMC members plus the active committers who are not
>> PMC members yet.
>
> Maybe not specific enough
> - active ANT committers or
> - active APACHE committers?
active
> (4) identify the initial set of committers
>
> All current Ant PMC members plus the active committers who are not PMC
> members yet.
Maybe not specific enough
- active ANT committers or
- active APACHE committers?
Jan
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like it.
Great.
> My only concern at the moment is this: Am I correct that part of
> this effort (likely a very early part) would be the assigning of
> existing tasks/types to proper subprojects,
No, that's not intended (by me) at
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I threatened, here is the proposal. This is not
> a vote yet and I'm
> going to also put it up the Wiki so we can work on
> it together.
I like it. My only concern at the moment is this: Am
I correct that part of this effort (likely
Hi,
as I threatened, here is the proposal. This is not a vote yet and I'm
going to also put it up the Wiki so we can work on it together.
I've kept it rather formal since a subproject deserves it IMHO. The
scope definition has been kept rather tight and at least I want to
keep it that way.
The
