Morten Mortensen wrote:
...Sure, I understand your points. And I also admit - the XML-spec does
*not* say that; it does say white-space should be passed to the app! I just
had a harder look.
dont worry about it, XML is a complex little spec. And then there is XSD...
But the same section (http://www
ainly not I, who invented the
"break" term.
But of course, that is a long time ago. Opinions change.
Regards,
Morten Sabroe Mortensen
-----Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: 04-08-03 19:01
Subject: Re: "echo"-task, ignorable whitespace and
Morten Mortensen wrote:
Hi Stefan & all,
Sure - "bad". :)
The text for the "fail"-task and so on - they have the same... functionality
as "echo"?
Any task that accepts text content, that it has a setText() method, has
the right to be given the content text with all whitespace, as permitted
by the
Morten Mortensen wrote:
It will break things? That, of course, is between "bad" and "annoing".
But technically, I am right?
There are other people out there - e.g. me - who are trying to automate
things - reformatting XML, in particular Ant-files, and who refer to the XML
specification to see, what
why
not consider to do something about it as part of Ant 2?
At least, please keep this in mind when discussing development.
Regards,
Morten Sabroe Mortensen
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04-08-03 10:30
Subject: Re: "echo"-task, ignor
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Morten Mortensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It will break things? That, of course, is between "bad" and
> "annoing".
Largely on the side of "bad" IMHO.
> But technically, I am right?
Sure.
Stefan
-
To un
j, Danmark
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tietoenator.com
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31. juli 2003 08:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: "echo"-task, ignorable whitespace and CDATA-elements
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Mort
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Morten Mortensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice, if the "echo" task worked a bit different -
> actually *ignored* leading and trailing whitespace in the body of
> the text.
It may be possible to make that an option, but not the default IMHO.
I know a few build
Hi all,
It would be nice, if the "echo" task worked a bit different - actually
*ignored* leading and trailing whitespace in the body of the text.
The reason is, that XML-pretty-formatters - which does not change the
semantics of the XML formatted relative to the specification - may alter the
act
